Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Looking for Savvy Girls in the Post-Girl-Power Era Natalie Coulter (bio) Currie, Dawn H., Deirdre M. Kelly, and Shauna Pomerantz. "Girl Power": Girls Reinventing Girlhood. New York: Peter Lang, 2009. 282 pp. ISBN 978-0-8204-8877-6. $33.95 pb. Print. Mediated Youth 4. Durham, M. Gigi . The Lolita Effect: The Media Sexuality of Young Girls and What We Can Do About It. New York: Overlook, 2008. 286 pp. $24.95 hc. ISBN 978-1-59020-063-6. Print. Lamb, Sharon, and Lyn Mikel Brown. Packaging Girlhood: Rescuing Our Daughters from Marketers' Schemes. New York: St. Martin's, 2006. 336 pp. $24.95 hc. ISBN 978-0-312-35250-9. Print. Levin, Diane E., and Jean Kilbourne. So Sexy So Soon: The New Sexualized Childhood and What Parents Can Do to Protect Their Kids. New York: Ballantine, 2009. 240 pp. $15.00 pb. ISBN 978-0-345-50507-1. Print. Wow, I'm shell-shocked. Being a mother of two young daughters, I am terrified. The world is fraught for my daughters. After reading four books on the state of girlhood, my initial reaction is horror. Here's what I have to worry about: songs with lyrics that quip "if it isn't rough it isn't fun," toddler-sized French-maid outfits amid the racks of Disney Princess dresses sold at Halloween (Durham 204), Bratz dolls that come with hip-hugger underwear and padded bras (Levin and Kilbourne 42), and T-shirts for four-year-olds emboldened with the slogan "spoil me . . . cuz I'm worth it" (Lamb and Brown 27). What kind of world are my girls headed into? How will I deal with the pressures on them to be the sassy little vixens that popular culture tells them they should be? Of course, prior to actually having children, I had [End Page 177] always thought that, as a scholar of children's culture and girls' studies, I would have the proper tools to allow me to calmly eliminate these pressures on my daughters. I would intuitively raise young socially aware girls who would make their groovy girl dolls drive trucks and be airplane pilots. Well, hah! What was I thinking? Having just survived a Christmas in which my four-year-old daughter begged for a Barbie doll wearing black high-heeled boots, I am beginning to realize my powerlessness in the face of the frothy pink princess machine that seems to suck up young girls. But perhaps this reaction is not fair. Perhaps I am being too sensitive to the images of girlhood in the media culture that surrounds my girls and I am just blindly falling into a moral panic about the state of girlhood. Well, not if the authors of these books are right. These authors suggest that girls are surrounded by culture that constantly tells them that they have little value, and what value they do have is in being sexual. But, as these works reveal, girls' relations with this popular culture is complex and talking to them about it is very messy. The Lolita Effect, written by University of Iowa journalism professor M. Gigi Durham, is a thoughtful, well-researched exposé on what she terms the "Lolita Effect." The basic premise of Durham's work is that the media (she includes everything from video games to teen magazines) circulates five damaging myths about girls' sexuality. Together, these myths make up the "Lolita Effect," which is "the distorted and delusional set of myths about girls' sexuality that circulates widely in our culture and throughout the world that works to limit, undermine, and restrict girls' sexual progress" (12). The first myth is that girls don't choose boys, boys choose girls—but only sexy girls; second, that there is only one kind of sexy; third, that girls should work to be that type of sexy; fourth, that the younger a girl is the sexier she is; and fifth, that sexual violence can be hot. These myths get more and more worrisome as Durham systematically works her way through them. Building on a wide range of examples, Durham succinctly illustrates how each of the myths came into being and how they operate. Durham...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».