Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor.—This letter calls attention to 3 potentially significant pitfalls that may result from misinterpretation of vascular alterations in the lung and pleural tissues in patients with pneumothorax. Two of the 3 vascular alterations (pseudoeosinophilic vasculitis and pseudohypertensive arteriopathy) have previously been published but may nonetheless be underrecognized. The third, a peculiar pseudo arteriovenous malformation (AVM), does not appear to have been previously reported.A woman, 44 years old, presented with sudden onset of pleuritic pain and shortness of breath. Clinicoradiologic evaluation supported a diagnosis of pneumothorax. At surgery, bullae from the left upper lobe were excised and submitted for histopathologic evaluation. In addition to pleural fibrosis, bullae formation, and chronic inflammation, the most prominent microscopic finding was a florid, eosinophil-rich, nonnecrotizing transmural vasculitis involving medium-sized arteries (Figure 1). The differential diagnosis included Churg-Strauss syndrome, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, eosinophilic vasculitis such as seen in systemic lupus erythematosus, and a parasitic infestation of the lung. A workup including immunostains for S100 protein and CD1a combined with a clinicoradiographic evaluation of the patient helped to exclude all of the previously mentioned diagnoses. The correct diagnosis was reactive eosinophilic vascular infiltration (REVI). First described by Luna et al,1 REVI is characterized by a rather impressive (at least in this particular case) eosinophilic infiltration of vascular walls, without necrosis, mimicking some of the previously cited conditions. In contrast to true vasculitis, REVI is limited to and more pronounced in the immediate subpleural regions and fades toward the interior of the lung. REVI has received limited attention in current major textbooks of pulmonary pathology. It is briefly noted in one text2 but not mentioned in others.3–8 Its true frequency is not known. Among 29 cases of spontaneous pneumothorax seen at our institution since January 2004, 5 had mild perivascular eosinophilia but none showed the extreme degree of vascular eosinophilic inflammation noted in the index case. The pathogenesis of REVI is unknown. A defect related to vascular transport of eosinophils to the injured pleural surface has been considered.1 Awareness and recognition of REVI may lessen patient anxiety and limit unnecessary clinical and serologic investigations into possible vasculitis syndromes. The 2 patients reported by Luna et al were without symptoms up to 48 months from diagnosis suggesting a favorable outcome.An adolescent boy, 17 years old, presented with acute symptomatology related to recurrent pneumothorax. Starting at age 12 the patient, who has a tall, slender body habitus, had experienced several painful bouts of pneumothorax. At surgery, fibrotic tissue from the apex of his right lung was removed. Microscopic examination showed chronic pleuritis with fibrosis and single thick-walled vessels in the pulmonary parenchyma (Figure 2) as well as conglomerates of equally thick-walled vessels beneath the pleural surface (Figure 3). The vascular changes affecting single parenchymal vessels closely resembled pulmonary hypertension. This type of vasculopathy affecting single vessels is well described in some texts of pulmonary pathology36 but not in others.24578 Cyr and associates9 reviewed 20 cases of idiopathic spontaneous pneumothorax and determined the prevalence and severity of pseudohypertensive medial and intimal lesions in pulmonary arteries and veins. Pulmonary artery medial hypertrophy, venous intimal fibrosis, and pulmonary artery intimal fibrosis were found 15%, 80%, and 90% of the cases, respectively. The authors concluded this rather common but underrecognized vasculopathy is possibly secondary to chronic inflammation and fibrosis and of no clinical or hemodynamic significance and should not be confused as evidence of pulmonary hypertension. Our findings in the previously cited 29 patients, showing medial hypertrophy and intimal thickening in 13 of the 29 cases, confirm the high frequency of these pseudohypertensive changes.The Cyr paper, however, and none of the previously cited texts of pulmonary pathology address the occurrence of thick-walled vascular conglomerations in cases of pneumothorax such as those illustrated in Figure 3. At first, these changes prompted the initial consideration of an acquired AVM and the possibility of a right to left shunt. However, in genuine AVMs, the affected vasculature adopts an ectatic or cavernous appearance and the vascular walls become thin and stretched (Figure 4). In all probability, the pseudo AVM changes are likely to represent a proliferative vasculopathy secondary to rupture and/or inflammation of blebs/bullae with subsequent formation of adhesions and the development of “parasitic” hypertrophied vessels within the adhesions. Similar vascular proliferations may be seen in tissues harboring old healed abscesses and other chronic inflammatory conditions of the lung. In the setting of pneumothorax, pseudo AVM changes appear to be rare, having been found in the index patient but none of the other 29 cases. As is the case with REVI and the pseudohypertensive changes, these vascular lesions will assume unwarranted clinical importance only if surgical pathologists misinterpret their significance.I acknowledge the helpful review of case 2 by John C. English, MD, University of British Columbia, Vancouver.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,009 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».