MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1841609815

The epidemiology and molecular characterization of colorectal cancer in eastern Newfoundland

2003· dissertation· en· W1841609815 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Fiona K. Curtis

Notice bibliographique

RevueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University) · 2003
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueGenetic factors in colorectal cancer
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineProbandFamily historyPopulationCancer registryEpidemiologyLynch syndromeColorectal cancerCancerInternal medicineGeneticsDNA mismatch repairBiologyEnvironmental healthMutation
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Background: Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colon Cancer (HNPCC) is a dominantly inherited disorder caused by germ-line defects of mismatch repair (MMR) genes. HNPCC can be diagnosed using clinical and genetic criteria. Few population-based studies have been undertaken to determine the genetic basis of CRC. The purpose of this pilot project was to determine the proportion of hereditary vs. sporadic CRC cases on the Avalon Peninsula (AP) of Newfoundland and to determine the genetic basis of disease in hereditary cases. -- Methods: The population studied was identified through the Newfoundland Cancer Treatment and Research Foundation (NCTRF) registry, the meditech system (a hospital reporting tool), and pathology reports. One hundred and sixty-eight potential probands were identified, diagnosed in either 1997 or 1998, between the ages of 20-69, and residing on the AP. Probands, or an appropriate next of kin if a proband was deceased, were interviewed to determine family history of cancer. Contact was made with 158 eligible participants of which one hundred and six (67%) agreed to participate in the study. The final number of study subjects was 79, which was 74.5% of those who agreed to participate. The NCTRF registry and a review of medical charts were used for the collection of baseline characteristics which included demographic and clinical data. -- Probands were classified by their family history using the Amsterdam Criteria (AC), Amsterdam II Criteria, and several other criteria to identify familial risk of HNPCC. Microsatellite analysis (n= 74) and immunohistochemistry analysis (n= 71) for hMLH1, hMSH2, and hMSH6 was completed on proband's normal and tumour DNA. We also examined the diagnostic utility of microsatellite analysis and of protein expression to identify High Risk (HR) families, in comparison to Low Risk (LR) families. -- Results: Twenty-two (28.2%) families were considered HR with 6 families fulfilling the AC I, 1 family fulfilling the AC II, and 15 families fulfilling our Age and Cancer Modified AC (youngest cancer ≤ 60 rather than 50). Twenty-two (28.2%) families were Intermediate Risk (IR), and 34 (43.6%) families were (LR) for HNPCC. However 13 of the LR families had an uninformative family structure. All Amsterdam Criteria families had previously been referred to the Newfoundland Medical Genetics program. -- Sixteen cases (21.6%) had high frequency microsatellite instability (MSI-H) tumours. Sixteen cases (22.5%) had absence of protein expression for at least one of three proteins. For the HR group 6 (31.6%) had MSI-H tumours and all showed absence of protein expression. Fourteen (68.4%) of the HR group had microsatellite stable (MSS) tumours of which 13 (92.9%) expressed all the proteins. For their group 4 (22.2%) had MSI-H tumours and all showed absence of protein expression. Fourteen (77.8%) of the IR group had MSS tumours and all expressed the proteins. For the LR group 4 (12.5%) had MSI-H tumours and 3 (9.4%) of these showed absence of protein expression. Twenty-eight (87.5%) of the LR group had MSS tumours of which 27 (96.4%) expressed all proteins. -- The sensitivity of the laboratory methods used in predicting cases that are high risk for HNPCC was 35.0% and the specificity of the methods in predicting cases that do not have HNPCC was 78.9%. -- Conclusions: We conclude that in the Eastern Newfoundland population the risk for HNPCC is high. Twenty-eight percent of families with CRC are at high risk for HNPCC. Furthermore the prevalence of MSS tumours in the HR group was high. It is likely that novel genes predisposing to HNPCC occur in the Newfoundland population. The utility of testing for MSI and MMR protein expression for the diagnosis of HNPCC in this population was poor.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,251
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,505

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,302
Écart entre enseignants0,274 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2003
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueMemorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)Même sujetGenetic factors in colorectal cancerTravaux en français237 207