Memory from one-trial training is resistant to extinction in Lymnaea Stagnaliss
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background: Memories that follow a traumatic event or extreme stress have been shown in some cases, to be particularly resistant to therapies meant to reduce their impact on patients. Two methods shown to decrease memories in laboratory tests are disruption after reactivation and extinction training. Newly formed memories undergo a period of stabilization, during which they are susceptible to amnesia treatments. Over a period of time memories become stabilized and can no longer be disrupted. However memories that are retrieved are returned to a labile state that must undergo a process of ‘reconsolidation’. Also, many memories can be occluded by ‘extinction training’, which consists of withholding the training stimulus in the training environment resulting in a new memory that overshadows the original training. Methods and Results: Using the Lymnaea stagnalis model system we show that memories following an extreme aversive stimulus demonstrate resistance to manipulation by these methods. Lymnaea stagnalis are fresh-water pond snails that can breathe either cutaneously or aerially through an orifice (pneumostome). Snails can form a long-term memory (LTM) to suppress pneumostome opening after operant conditioning consisting of either multiple sessions of repeated tactile stimulation to the orifice area each time the snail attempts to open its pneumostome or a single applications of 25mM KCl stimulus contingent with pneumostome opening (one-trial training; 1TT). The LTM formed following one-trial training has many of the same characteristics as memory formed following repetitive tactile training. Specifically, both are dependent on new mRNA synthesis in the circuit that controls aerial respiration and both can be blocked by cooling immediately after training. However, we show that memories in Lymnaea that form after a single, highly aversive stimulus, unlike LTM after repetitive training, aren’t disrupted after reactivation. We also attempted to extinguish the 1TT memory by placing the snails in the training beaker and not applying the KCl stimulus when they opened their pneumostome. When repetitive training was employed, extinction sessions such as these resulted in naïve levels of aerial respiration i.e. occlusion of the operantly trained memory. Conclusions: Therefore, memory after 1TT is more resistant to suppression by extinction training than memories formed after less aversive stimuli. Further research will attempt to determine the cellular mechanism that causes the memory to be particularly resilient.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».