MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1843413878 · doi:10.1155/2008/923879

Positron Emission Tomography Scanning and Gastroenterology

2008· article· en· W1843413878 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean-Luc Urbain, Paul C. Adams

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology · 2008
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Établissements canadiensUniversity HospitalWestern University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPositron emission tomographyNuclear medicineMedical physicsBrain positron emission tomographyTomographyPositron emissionMedicinePreclinical imagingRadiologyBiologyGeneticsIn vivo

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Dr Jean-Luc Urbain is the Citywide Chief of Nuclear Medicine in London and the Chair of Nuclear Medicine at the University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario. He was actively engaged in Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Biology Research at Temple University in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA where he received his PhD in Genetics and Molecular Biology. Dr Urbain has been a full Professor of Diagnostic Imaging for more than a decade and has held leadership positions in Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging at Fox Chase Cancer Center (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania), the Cleveland Clinic (Cleveland, Ohio) and does so now at the University of Western Ontario. Dr Jean-Luc Urbain is the Citywide Chief of Nuclear Medicine in London, Ontario and the Chair of Nuclear Medicine at the University of Western Ontario (London) Dr Urbain has been involved with positron emission tomography (PET) imaging since its early days in Belgium in 1984. He has given multiple lectures and seminars on PET and regularly teaches the diagnostic imaging community how to interpret PET images. PA: Many gastroenterologists commonly deal with patients with gastrointestinal (GI) tumours. These tumours may be diagnosed by endoscopy, ultrasound and computed tomography (CT) scanning, and may be confirmed by biopsy. Some patients are referred for surgical therapy, and more advanced disease is often discovered after surgery. Does PET scanning show potential in reducing the understaging of GI tumours (ie, in the colon, liver, stomach and pancreas)? JLU: In fact, one of the early success stories with PET scanning was its ability to distinguish between scar tissue and the recurrence of colorectal carcinoma following surgery and radiation therapy on the pelvis. This work led to the reimbursement of the cost of the PET procedure in 1990 in Belgium for that indication. Over the past 25 years, numerous PET studies with fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) have clearly demonstrated the benefits of PET and, more recently, combined PET/CT (Figure 1) for the staging, restaging and therapeutic follow-up of colon and colorectal carcinomas, hepatomas, neuroendocrine tumours and abdominal metastases. Some success has also been reported with PET/CT in the detection of pancreatic tumours with FDG and radiolabelled amino acids. Overall, PET scintigraphy with FDG significantly changes the management of patients with GI tumours by understaging and over-staging approximately 30% of cases. Figure 1) Combined positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) scanning images of a 65-year-old patient with pancreatic carcinoma (red cross-hair lines) on the coronal, sagittal and transaxial CT, PET and fused images and lung metastasis to the ... In combination with CT in hybrid PET/CT equipment, PET scintigraphy seems to promise an even greater impact. PA: Can you remind us of why the isotope is preferentially absorbed by tumours? Is this highly specific or are there false-positive scans? JLU: Deoxyglucose labelled in the 2′ carbon position by an atom of fluorine is absorbed by most cells as an analogue of glucose. To satisfy their increased metabolic needs, cancer cells preferentially take on 18-fluorine-labelled (18F)-FDG by overexpressing the glucose transporters at their surface and switching their metabolic pathways in high gear toward the production of ATP. 18F-FDG enters the early steps of the glycolytic pathway and rapidly becomes trapped inside cancer cells, reflecting their higher uptake and metabolism. The sensitivity and specificity of 18F-FDG PET scanning to detect tumours varies in function of the type of tumour, its metabolism, aggressiveness and size. PET scintigraphy has a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 90% for detecting the recurrence of colorectal carcinomas. Inflammatory and infectious processes can generate false-positive scans because inflammatory cells also avidly absorb 18F-FDG. Remember that glucose is not a specific substrate. PA: Can you comment on hybrid scans of the abdomen in the assessment of GI tumours? JLU: Hybrid imagers, such as combined PET/CT scanners, give you the best of both worlds in ‘one-stop shopping’ by providing information on the metabolic stage of the tumour, and its precise size and localization in the body. The superiority of these hybrid PET/CT scanners over PET-only machines became evident very quickly after their introduction in 2000. Today, no major manufacturer of medical imaging still produces PET-only scanners. PA: It is implied that an early diagnosis of advanced cancer may lead to more appropriate therapies or the avoidance of surgery when it will not be curative. Have these concepts been fulfilled in clinical practice? JLU: As a rule of thumb, prevention in medicine is always better than therapy. The ability of PET imaging to detect metabolically overactive tumours with a size of approximately 0.5 cm, very early on, enables a curative surgical approach before the cancer has metastasized. Unnecessary surgeries can also be avoided if the PET images demonstrate a significant spread of the disease. We have seen many cases of patients with colorectal carcinoma who were referred for restaging due to elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels who had unsuspected metastases in the lung and/or liver. Some private centres in the United States have begun to offer preventive whole-body PET/CT scanning in a model that is similar to the detection of breast cancer with mammography. PA: It seems as though some provincial governments have not endorsed the use of PET scanning. Can you provide us with a synopsis of both sides of this argument, as well as what we may expect in terms of availability in Canada in the future? JLU: Most countries have long recognized the usefulness of PET scanning with 18F-FDG in the staging, restaging and therapeutic follow-up of patients with various types of tumours. PET imaging with 18F-FDG is now covered by the provincial health care authorities in Quebec and British Columbia. For some arbitrary reasons that I suspect to be essentially financial in nature, Ontario has chosen the path of redemonstrating to the rest of the world that 18F-FDG PET is useful in patients with cancers by performing limited scope trials. The diagnostic imaging and oncology communities are hoping that by 2010, most Canadian provinces will develop some common sense and provide wide coverage for PET imaging with 18F-FDG, which has repeatedly been shown around the world to dramatically improve the management of patients with cancer.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,021

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,005
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,227 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2008
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Journal of Gastroenterology→Même sujetRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging→Travaux en français237 207→