Notice bibliographique
Résumé
These are exciting times for our association, as it consolidates the transition from a simpler volunteer organization to a more complex one with a professional workforce. The CUA has gone from an entity whose main role was organizing the Annual Meeting, to one with many year-round initiatives. These include the Office of Education (OE), CUAJ, the patient brochure initiative and our guidelines. The complexity and cost of the organization has increased substantially. This reflects the increasing maturity of the CUA and the higher expectations of its members. Growth creates opportunities and challenges. The opportunities are obvious. The OE resoundingly establishes the CUA as an organizer of continuing medical education activities year-round. CUAJ is a wonderful initiative, of which we should all be proud, and has tremendous upside potential. The patient information brochures have had a huge and positive impact on patient education. The challenges relate primarily to the future. Where are we going, and what kind of organization do we want to become? What services should we focus on? What kind of annual meeting serves our members the best? Should we increase our political activities (as the AUA has done) at the federal level? What direction should the OE take? What can we do to make us more attractive to Canadian urologists (there are about 150 nonmembers in Canada)? How can we increase our visibility to the medical profession and the public? What about our financial stability? Remarkably, there is no record of the CUA ever going through a formal strategic planning process to address these questions in a systematic way. To that end, we are planning to do this with the CUA executive this year. We have engaged a strategic planning consultant to assist in this process. Over the next few months a series of interviews will be carried out with the current, past and future CUA leadership, as well as with many members of the executive. Questionnaires will be sent out to many members. This process will aim to gather diverse perspectives. The process will culminate in a full-day retreat just before the CUA executive meeting in January, followed by a formal report. We hope that this document will serve as a road map for the next 5 years, and will contribute to the development of a mature and healthy CUA that meets its members’ needs in many domains, including education, practice support, manpower planning and publication. Some members have expressed justifiable concern about the growth of the central office and the increased costs involved. Members are likely aware that the CUA shares offices and personnel with the Societe Internationale d’Urologie (SIU). Your executive has exercised a great deal of due diligence in evaluating the performance of the central office and establishing a sound cost-shared arrangement for the future. We are very satisfied that the current arrangement is reasonable and fair. We benefit tremendously from the experience and diverse talents of the CUA staff and have been able to leverage the lessons they learned from managing the SIU.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,018 | 0,082 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,009 | 0,007 |
| Communication savante | 0,026 | 0,015 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,017 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,018 | 0,026 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,161 | 0,154 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».