MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1847393911 · doi:10.14288/1.0094810

Effects of fertilization on the nutrient and organic matter dynamics of reclaimed coal-mined areas and native grasslands in Southeastern British Columbia

2010· article· en· W1847393911 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Paul Ziemkiewicz

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEarth and Planetary Sciences
ThématiqueCoal and Its By-products
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNutrientEnvironmental scienceOrganic matterLand reclamationHuman fertilizationCoalAgroforestryGeographyEcologyAgronomyArchaeologyBiology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reclamation of coal mining disturbances has been undertaken on a large scale in British Columbia since 1972. Mining occurs primarily in a narrow belt in southeastern B.C. from the international boundary northward parallel to the continental divide to the headwaters of the Elk River at elevations of 1,000 m to 2,300 m. Since reclamation began, most treated areas have been fertilized annually as a precaution against reclamation failure. While this practice has often maintained productive and attractive reclamation sites it was not known whether the maintenance fertilization was necessary and what effect it was having on plant community development. To answer these questions two productive reclaimed areas and two adjacent native, undisturbed grasslands were selected. One set of plots was amid montane vegetation and the other amid subalpine vegetation. On each of the four sites, paired plots were established and shoot, detritus and root biomass levels were measured over a 14-month period. One of the paired plots was fertilized in the spring. N, P and K analyses were done on soil and plant samples so that organic matter and nutrient flux in the four plant community compartments could be expressed as mass per unit ground surface. Two phases in reclaimed area development, were identified. The development phase was characterized by detritus accumulation and minor root mass turnover in the fall. Fertilization had a profound influence on this phase mainly in stimulating shoot production though root production was stimulated to a lesser degree. The withdrawal of maintenance fertilization resulted in a severe drop in production and nutrient accumulation with a large part of yearly N and P uptake immobilized in surface detritus by fall. The subalpine reclaimed area represented this phase. The data indicate that maintenance fertilization will be necessary to prevent degeneration of the plant community. The montane reclaimed area represented the mature phase of development. This phase may not indicate attainment of a steady state, but it appeared to be capable of storing and cycling sufficient nutrients that withdrawal of maintenance fertilization resulted in no apparent adverse effects. Rather, due to the midsummer drought, fertilization of this reclaimed area inhibited root production while it stimulated shoot production. The additional shoot production could not be maintained through the dry period, so that shoot standing crop through the summer was not influenced by fertilization. The native areas were characterized by massive root systems which caused the bulk of nutrient exchanges to occur within plant and from root to soil to root. Thus the surface detritus system played a minor role in nutrient cycling relative to the reclaimed areas. Fertilization of natives areas stimulated shoot production and detrital decomposition so root:shoot ratios narrowed and detritus levels dropped after fertilization. The reclaimed areas were less stable than the native areas in relation to water and nutrient stress. However, the montane reclaimed area seemed self-sufficient in. nutrients and should continue to develop without annual fertilization. The subalpine reclaimed area is not nutrient self-sufficient and will require continued treatment.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,642
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,683

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,004
Tête enseignante GPT0,140
Écart entre enseignants0,136 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Même sujetCoal and Its By-productsTravaux en français237 207