36 COMPARISON OF THE DEVELOPMENTAL POTENTIAL OF CAPRINE NUCLEAR TRANSFER EMBRYOS DERIVED FROM IN VITRO AND IN VIVO MATURED OOCYTES
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The objective of this study was to compare the development to the blastocyst stage of reconstructed caprine nuclear transfer (NT) embryos derived from two sources of ova. In vivo oocytes were flushed from the oviduct of superovulated donors by exposing the reproductive tract via a small ventral laparotomy. In vitro oocytes were collected from ovaries supplied by an abattoir located in Purdue, IN. Oocytes were aspirated, cultured in maturation medium (M199 + 10% goat serum, 3 µg mL-1 LH, 3 µg mL-1 FSH and 0.22 mM sodium pyruvate), and shipped overnight (38°C, air). Donor cell preparation and NT procedures were as previously reported (Behboodi et al., 2001 Theriogenology 55, 254 abst). Donor cells were transfected female fetal fibroblasts that were synchronized by 4 days of serum starvation, followed by a 10-hour exposure to medium containing 10% FCS. Oocytes were enucleated, karyoplast-cytoplast couplets were reconstructed, fused and then activated simultaneously by a single electrical pulse. Couplets containing in vitro oocytes were incubated in the presence of 5 µg mL-1 ionomycin after fusion. Fused couplets were co-cultured in TCM199 with 10% FCS and oviductal epithelial cells for 8–10 days (38°C, 5% CO2). Embryos that developed in vitro to the blastocyst stage were surgically transferred to recipients. Pregnancies were confirmed by ultrasonography. One live kid was delivered on Day 150 of gestation via elective C-section. Southern blotting analysis confirmed that it was derived from the transgenic donor cell line. These experiments show that in vivo matured oocytes not only better support caprine NT embryo development to the blastocyst stage, but also can result in live birth (table). Although fusion and cleavage rates were similar in the two groups, development to the blastocyst stage was significantly higher (Student’s t-test) in the group utilizing in vivo-matured oocytes. In conclusion, this is the first live goat produced from goat NT blastocysts developed in vitro. This suggests that in vivo matured oocytes may be superior to oocytes developed in vitro for generating live animals from NT blastocysts. Table 1
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».