Notice bibliographique
Résumé
What does teenage fiction suggest to us about being a body in time and space?Six popular young adult novels are used to approach this question in this paper.If in the act of reading, the language and text leak into our lives and become an organic part of our relationships, then what happens to us when we read different kinds of books, and what do we learn from our readings about living in the world?In some young adult novels, we come face to face with characters who are absolutely individualistic and self-centred.What is it about these books that makes us want to read them?Do these books sever our bodies and living from relationships which might be possible?And then there are other books which remind us of the ways our identity is caught up in and tangled through how we live in our bodies in the world.Does it make a difference what books adolescent readers in our classrooms have access to?Recently in a Large Chain Super Bookstore, while browsing with my sister, sipping too-sweet grandemochalattafrappynappycinnos, we stopped before the shelves containing literally hundreds of series books written and published for the teenage (mostly female) readership.While I knew many of these books only through child readers in my classroom, my sister, ten years younger than I, remembered reading many of them with great fondness.She walked down the shelves and pointed to the books, recalling in significant detail certain characters and story lines.Why did you read so many of them?I asked her.Why did you like them so much?Her response: The books (in her case mostly Sweet Valley High and Babysitter's Club) gave her an imaginary world where she could be everything she wasn't: Thin.Beautiful.Popular.She explained how the characters in the stories, while usually not extremely rich, were well enough off to afford the kinds of clothes and activities she could not.They had boyfriends and great families.They were relatively intelligent and successful in school if not the top students.Everyone liked them.They were all-round perfect girls.They lacked nothing.Their lives were easy and fun.That was her fantasy world.That was where she could live when immersed in the books.While she read, my sister could pretend to be those girls in all their popular thin pretty pink perfection confectionism.Yum.When I decided to take up the topic of this paper, I had something specific in mind, a line of discussion I planned to follow.I knew I wanted to address the ways (female?) bodies are represented in teenage fiction, and I knew I wanted to say something about the ways we "read" our bodies as we read fictional literature.I had the idea that certain books portray "bad" images and stories of bodies and experiences of relationships with our bodies, and I wanted to suggest that there might be some books which offer alternative representations and readings of our bodies, "good" books that is.I chose a few to fit in this category, with no specific criteria in mind other than I thought they might represent the human body, its experiences and relationships with the world, in interesting ways, in ways to make us stop and think about what it is to be/have a body living in this world:Out of the Dust, by Karen Hesse (1997) Owl in Love, by Patrice Kindl (1993)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,006 | 0,012 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».