Notice bibliographique
Résumé
In today's complex and evolving business environment, the busy practitioner has less and less time to be “jack of all trades” when it comes to balancing patient care responsibilities, managing the practice, keeping up-to-date on current developments, and having a life outside the business. Engaging in each of these activities has an opportunity cost; to wit, less time available to pursue one of the other responsibilities. Fortunately, the veterinary profession has made great strides in providing veterinarians with better support and greater varied expertise with respect to all the above functions. Practitioners should lean on their “primary advisors” for more than their traditional roles, as they have been defined. Primary advisors to practitioners generally include accountants, legal counsel, insurance advisors, mentors or colleagues, and self-interest organizations capable of offering various forms of individual support products or services; continuing education; and specific practice management advice or general advice on strategic planning in all functional areas of a practice, including income trusts management, marketing, operations, human resources, facility management, and business and personal financial management. Each practice should be aware of, and subsequently identify, who these individuals are and what services are available. Perhaps the greatest advances in terms of breadth of available services and products come from organizations representing the interests of the profession. Veterinarians who see membership in these organizations as “just another expense” need to recognize their number of potential direct benefits for the individual and indirect benefits for the profession. Without the support of practitioners, these organizations lack the financial leverage, political clout, critical mass, and economy of scale to effect timely change. Not only can these organizations help to facilitate more effective and efficient practice management, visible membership (framed certificates) to clients can help to brand a practice and signal to clients a perception of a relatively high level of assurance and professionalism that will translate into better care for their pets. Domestically, in recent years, provincial veterinary medical associations and the Canadian Veterinary Medical Association (CVMA) have broadened their services through such central and vital efforts, including, for example, the establishment of suggested fee guides and rationales for fees, consultative processes to help benchmark high performing practices, facilitation of employment for veterinarians changing roles, leadership on animal welfare issues, public relations, and, of course, continuing education. Internationally, there are 2 organizations with a Canadian presence and with value-added services to practitioners that are worth noting and publicizing. The CVMA has created a working relationship or functional partnership with the National Committee on Veterinary Economic Issues (NCVEI). The NCVEI emerged several years ago to address the downward economic trend in veterinary practice that was identified by the 1999 KPMG veterinary market study in the United States (1). Since 2000, this organization has and is tackling many issues of importance to the profession in Canada and the United States, including pricing strategies; improving the delivery system; gender differences and demographic trends in the profession; and strategies to improve the skills, knowledge, attitude, and aptitude of veterinarians. Practitioners can “take the pulse” of their practice at no cost and can confidentially and anonymously compare their practice results with those of other similar or different practices. Another international organization with a prominent profile and national membership base in Canada is the American Animal Hospital Association (AAHA). I recently had the privilege of being appointed to the Board of the AAHA. Led by a talented Board and dedicated and skilled staff, the AAHA continues to set the bar for exemplary standards in companion animal care in North America. The AAHA has recently embarked enthusiastically on some major initiatives, including an extensive revision and enhancement of the standards expected of AAHA accredited hospitals, changing their established publications, such as the Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association and Trends to an electronic format for more effective access to a wider variety of literary sources on clinical and management issues, supplemented by an extensive variety of printed references available through the AAHA Press. The AAHA has a wide variety of on-site and remote access continuing education tools available to facilitate its vision of the “practice team” and to help to train and educate all team members for improved performance and service. The AAHA is further concentrating on management issues surrounding the lifecycle of the companion animal practice and veterinarian, from veterinary student and new graduate issues to transition issues for the later career veterinarian. If you are seeking ways to improve your practice and further develop yourself or members of your staff, check out what some of the organized bodies of the veterinary profession have to offer. They are there to make our lives better!
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,040 | 0,058 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,023 |
| Communication savante | 0,016 | 0,014 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,017 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,008 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,024 | 0,020 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».