MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1874315016

Marijuana Use in Canada: Patterns of Use Among Medical Marijuana Users

2015· dissertation· en· W1874315016 sur OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Samantha Shiplo

Notice bibliographique

RevueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2015
Typedissertation
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCannabis and Cannabinoid Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesUniversity of Waterloo
Mots-clésCannabisPsychologyGeographyMedicinePsychiatry
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Research evidence supports the use of marijuana for the purpose of relieving medical symptoms and, therefore, the Canadian courts granted Canadians legal access to marijuana for medical purposes. More than 40,000 Canadians are currently approved to use medical marijuana, with an additional 400,000 Canadians reporting use of marijuana for medical purposes. During the study period, Marihuana for Medical Purposes Regulations (MMPR) was the medical marijuana regulation in effect in Canada, which allowed patients with a medical document from a physician to purchase dried marijuana from a Health Canada licensed producer. Medical marijuana regulations infer how medical marijuana is to be accessed and used. The mode of delivery—whether marijuana is smoked, vapourized, or consumed—may have important implications for potential therapeutic efficacy, as well as health risks. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the use of alternative and innovative modes of delivery is on the rise; however, there is very little evidence on current patterns of use among Canadian medical marijuana users, particularly with respect to modes of delivery. The primary objective of the current research was to examine patterns of use among Canadians using marijuana for medical purposes. The study had five specific aims: 1) To estimate the prevalence of different modes of delivery, 2) To examine perceptions and importance of various factors for different modes of delivery, 3) To estimate the prevalence of different forms of marijuana, 4) To examine the reasons for using different forms of marijuana, and 5) To assess prevalence and perceptions of different sources for obtaining medical marijuana. An overall sample of 364 approved adult Canadian medical marijuana users completed an online cross-sectional survey between April 29 and June 8, 2015. Participants were recruited through a convenience sample from Health Canada licensed producers. Nine Health Canada licensed producers from across Canada helped recruit participants mainly through email. The results showed that using a vapourizer was the most popular mode of delivery currently used (53%), even more so than smoking a joint (47%), indicating a possible increase in the use of vapourizers among approved medical users since the introduction of the MMPR. The main reason participants reported using a vapourizer was to reduce negative health consequences associated with smoking. Furthermore, current use of a vapourizer was associated with fewer respiratory symptoms (OR=1.28, 95%CI: 1.05-1.56, p=0.01) supporting that the use of vapourizers may be less harmful than smoking. Overall, 75% of participants reported using dried herb due to it’s easy accessibility, as it was the only legal form of marijuana available for purchase from licensed producers. It is important to note that accessibility of the forms of marijuana may change due to the recent revision to the MMPR allowing alternative forms of marijuana, in addition to dried herb, to be sold by licensed producers. Licensed producers, as the only legal source for obtaining medical marijuana at the time, was preferred by most approved users (44%). However, the city of Vancouver did not agree that licensed producers were a sufficient source for obtaining medical marijuana, thus, against federal medical marijuana law, decided to allow dispensaries and clubs to sell marijuana. Monitoring implications of such current and future changes to medical marijuana regulations may be beneficial to policymakers. Specifically, continuing to monitor and track medical marijuana use trends in terms of modes, forms, and sources in light of the present data. Overall, the current study addressed an important evidence gap on patterns of medical marijuana use in Canada following the introduction of the MMPR as it is critical to understand the population of medical users in order to inform marijuana policy.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,023
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,166

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,007
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,001
Communication savante0,0020,001
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,234
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Même sujetCannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchTravaux en français237 207