MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1875480488 · doi:10.1093/pch/10.9.539a

Case 2: Rash and allegations of neglect

2005· article· en· W1875480488 sur OpenAlexaff
Steven Bellemare

Notice bibliographique

RevuePaediatrics & Child Health · 2005
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOsteomyelitis and Bone Disorders Research
Établissements canadiensIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésNeglectRashMedicineDermatologyPsychiatry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

A 16-month-old boy with an extensive rash was brought to the emergency department by his mother's boyfriend. This person had left the household 1.5 months earlier and had not seen the child since his departure; he was shocked on his return to discover an extensive rash on the young boy (Figure 1). An extensive rash on a 16-month-old boy presenting to the emergency department The boyfriend made a number of allegations of neglect against the boy's mother, including improper nutrition. There was no pain, pruritus or fever. The boy's medical history revealed occasional diaper rashes. Growth parameters were normal. The boy was pale but happy. Confluent erythematous scaly plaques covered the back, abdomen, axillae and periorbital areas. On the perineum, the rash was clearly demarcated at the diaper edges, beefy red, glistening, desquamating and not showing much scaling. The intertriginous zones were not spared. The legs and arms showed evidence of pink papules and xerosis. The scalp showed extensive golden dry scales with little erythema. Some excoriations exhibited a golden discharge. Both ear canals contained purulent material. Retroauricular and sub-mandibular lymphadenopathy was noted. The remainder of the physical examination was normal. Laboratory investigations revealed a normal albumin level, a hemoglobin concentration of 110 g/L, and normal platelets and white blood cells. A subspecialty consultation revealed the diagnosis. A dermatologist was consulted and psoriasis was diagnosed. A discussion with the boy's mother revealed that his biological father had a history of psoriasis. Psoriasis has its onset in childhood in approximately one-third of patients. A family history is often present because the disease is associated with a number of human leukocyte antigens. Clinically, the disease can present in a number of forms. As in adults, an extensor distribution of the lesions is the most common presentation in children, but the lesions tend not to be as extensive and have a finer scale. Children often have more frequent facial and intertriginous (retroauricular, axillary and anogenital) involvement. In infants, atypical presentations of psoriasis can make the condition difficult to diagnose. Although neglect and inadequate hygiene can produce significant perineal dermatitis, the resulting exanthem tends to be painful, often sparing intertriginous areas. Involvement of other areas of the body should lead one to consider a broader differential diagnosis. Some infants with perineal psoriasis may be erroneously diagnosed with persistent diaper dermatitis; however, psoriatic exanthems tend to be painless and involve the intertriginous areas. Occasionally, diaper psoriasis can disseminate and progress rapidly to involve the entire body, a condition termed diaper psoriasis with dissemination. Another condition, diaper dermatitis with psoriasiform id reaction, is a reaction to diaper candidiasis and has a similar appearance. The child in the present case exhibited a significantly widespread dermatitis amid allegations of neglect and malnutrition. The diagnosis became clear early in the investigative process, limiting the testing performed. Other cases may not be as straightforward and may initially be confused with child abuse or neglect. A number of generalized and localized conditions can be mistaken for child abuse. Malnutrition, though it can result from either neglect or medical disease, can cause striking dermatological findings as a result of vitamin and mineral deficiency. Acrodermatitis enteropathica and dermatitis herpetiformis are two other diffuse dermatological conditions that can be mistaken for neglect with failure to thrive. However, these conditions are related to zinc malabsorption and gluten enteropathy, and are relatively easy to diagnose with laboratory tests. Other conditions, such as the rashes of eczema and Henoch-Schönlein purpura, the appearance of scarring in Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and various drug eruptions, have also been known to fool physicians into suspecting child abuse. Concerning localized skin eruptions may result from phytodermatitis. This results from a phototoxic reaction to psoralens from certain juices and can leave imprints of hands or objects. Discolouration of the skin from clothing or dyes can be confused with bruising. On the perineum, lichen sclerosus et atrophicus can cause bruise-like changes in the skin of the vulva, and senna-containing laxatives can cause a dermatitis of the buttocks so severe as to mimic a burn. Severe dermatitis in infants can be due to neglect, but a careful look at the history, features and extent of the rash may yield an underlying diagnosis. Psoriasis can present in infants as persistent diaper dermatitis. Several rashes suspicious for child abuse have underlying medical causes. The case presentation should not exceed 200 words and should give the reader enough information to suspect the diagnosis without making it obvious. The discussion should not exceed 600 words and should be followed by a couple of ‘clinical pearls’. A maximum of two references may be included, if helpful. The submitted cases will undergo peer review and revision at the discretion of the editors. Priority is given to cases illustrating an approach to common problems or important clinical clues to less common diagnoses that should not be missed. The Editorial Board hopes that this provides an opportunity for trainees and paediatricians practising outside of the teaching hospitals to share their clinical experiences and to publish in Paediatrics & Child Health. If you have a case to submit, contact Dr Friedman by e-mail at jeremy.friedman@sickkids.ca.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Étude de cas · Signal consensuel: Étude de cas
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,019

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,002
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,318
Écart entre enseignants0,298 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeÉtude de cas
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2005
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePaediatrics & Child HealthMême sujetOsteomyelitis and Bone Disorders ResearchTravaux en français237 207