Inhaled versus systemic corticosteroids for preventing chronic lung disease in ventilated very low birth weight preterm neonates
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Chronic lung disease (CLD) remains an important cause of mortality and morbidity in preterm infants and inflammation plays an important role in its pathogenesis. The use of inhaled corticosteroids may modulate the inflammatory process without concomitant high systemic steroid concentrations and less risk of adverse effects. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of inhaled versus systemic corticosteroids started within the first two weeks of life on preventing CLD in ventilated very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. SEARCH METHODS: Randomised and quasi-randomised trials were identified by searching The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE , EMBASE , CINAHL, reference lists of published trials and abstracts published in Pediatric Research or electronically on the Pediatric Academic Societies web site in June 2007.This search was updated in June 2011 and included additional searches of Clinicaltrials.gov, Controlled-trials.com and Web of Science. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised or quasi-randomised clinical trials comparing inhaled versus systemic corticosteroid therapy (regardless of the dose and duration of therapy) started in the first two weeks of life in VLBW infants receiving assisted ventilation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Outcomes including CLD at 28 days or 36 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA), mortality, the combined outcome of death or CLD at 28 days or 36 weeks PMA, other pulmonary outcomes and adverse effects were evaluated. All data were analysed using RevMan 5.1. Meta-analyses were performed using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), and mean difference (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals (CI). If RD was significant, the numbers needed to benefit (NNTB) or to harm (NNTH) were calculated. MAIN RESULTS: No new trials were identified in this update. Two trials qualified for inclusion in this review. The incidence of CLD at 36 weeks PMA was increased (of borderline statistical significance) in the inhaled steroid group [RR 1.45 (95% CI 0.99 to 2.11); RD 0.11 (95% CI 0.00 to 0.21), p = 0.05, one trial, n = 278]. The incidence of CLD at 36 weeks PMA among all survivors [RR 1.34 (95% CI 0.94 to 1.90); RD 0.11 (95% CI -0.02 to 0.24), one trial, n = 206], oxygen dependency at 28 days (two trials, n = 294), death by 28 days (two trials, n = 294) or 36 weeks PMA (two trials, n = 294) and the combined outcome of death or CLD by 28 days (two trials, n = 294) or 36 weeks PMA (one trial, n = 278) did not differ significantly between the groups. The duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly longer in the inhaled steroid group as compared to the systemic steroid group [typical MD 4 days (95% CI 0.2 to 8); two trials, n = 294] as was the duration of supplemental oxygen [typical MD 11 days (95% CI 2 to 20); two trials, n = 294]. The incidence of hyperglycaemia was significantly lower in the group receiving inhaled steroids [RR 0.52 (95% CI 0.39 to 0.71); RD -0.25 (95% CI -0.37 to -0.14); one trial, n = 278; NNTB 4 (95% CI 3 to 7) to avoid one infant experiencing hyperglycaemia]. The rate of patent ductus arteriosus was increased in the group receiving inhaled steroids [RR 1.64 (95% CI 1.23 to 2.17); RD 0.21 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.33); one trial, n = 278; NNTH 5 (95% CI 3 to 10)]. No information was available on long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This review found no evidence that early inhaled steroids confer important advantages over systemic steroids in the management of ventilator dependent preterm infants. Neither inhaled steroids nor systemic steroids can be recommended as a part of standard practice for ventilated preterm infants. Because they might have fewer adverse effects than systemic steroids, further randomised controlled trials of inhaled steroids are needed that address risk/benefit ratio of different delivery techniques, dosing schedules and long-term effects, with particular attention to neurodevelopmental outcome.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,008 | 0,022 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,004 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».