Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This research tried to provide basic data to the social support strengthening plan for it investigated whether the social support reached any effect on the psychological well-being of the rural elderly, or not increasing the psychological well-being of the rural elderly. For this purpose, this research classified the social support level which the rural elderly is late into the family support, relative support, and public support according to the social supporter and looked into. And it classified the rural elderly psychological well-being level into the positive well-being and negative well-being and looked into the first. Second, the difference of the social support according to the population sociology characteristic and psychological well-being were looked into. Third, in the preceding research, after controlling the age, confirmed as the factor having an effect on the social support of the rural elderly and psychological well-being monthly income, and health condition, the relatively influence that family support, relative support, and public support reaches to the psychological well-being of the rural elderly was looked into. In this research, the survey was performed for 170 old peoples more than the lives in Kyongsangbuk-do Chungdo-gun quarter age of 65. The investigation which supplemented and which it looks at from September 10th in 2011 until September 24th was performed. The total 190 part of questionnaires was distributed and 170 parts except was insincere or is not completed 20 parts of answer were used for the final analysis. Summarizing the result, it is obtained from this research, it is like the next. First, the level of the social support shows in this order-family support, relatives support, public supports. Namely, the rural elderly recognize the families support highest, on the other hand, recognjze the public support lowest. The social support of the rural elderly shows negative well-being higher than positive well-being. It shows that two dimension have negative relationship. Second, the result of analyze the difference of the social support according to the population sociology characteristic of the rural elderly and psychological well-being are as follows. First, as the age was low if we looked at the social support, the rural elderly recognized the whole social support and family support and relative support. And high the family support was high recognized as the monthly income was high. The more the age was high if we looked at the psychological well-being, the negative well-being of the psychological well-being was exposed to be high recognized as the health condition was bad. Third, in case the more the result of looking into the effect that the social support of the rural elderly reaches to the psychological well-being and health condition were similar, the rural elderly psychological well-being level t was high, the positive well-being of the psychological well-being which the rural elderly realizes as the official support was high showed high. In addition, the more the rural elderly psychological well-being level was low in case the monthly income was similar, the negative well-being of the psychological well-being which the rural elderly recognizes as the official support was low was shown up to be high. The theoretical, political, and practical undertone was presented based upon this kind of research result.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,005 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,050 | 0,131 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».