Stratigraphic relationships between the Middle Devonian Shell Lake Member and the Upper Winnipegosis reef mounds, Saskatchewan Sub-basin
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Research Article| June 01, 2004 Stratigraphic relationships between the Middle Devonian Shell Lake Member and the Upper Winnipegosis reef mounds, Saskatchewan Sub-basin Jichun Zhang; Jichun Zhang Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2 1Current address: Department of Geology, Brandon University, Brandon, MN R7A 6A9 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Katherine M. Bergman; Katherine M. Bergman Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Hairuo Qing Hairuo Qing Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Jichun Zhang 1Current address: Department of Geology, Brandon University, Brandon, MN R7A 6A9 Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2 Katherine M. Bergman Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2 Hairuo Qing Department of Geology, University of Regina, Regina, SK S4S 0A2 Publisher: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Received: 15 Oct 2003 Accepted: 08 Feb 2004 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 2368-0261 Print ISSN: 0007-4802 © The Society of Canadian Petroleum Geologists Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology (2004) 52 (2): 156–176. https://doi.org/10.2113/52.2.156 Article history Received: 15 Oct 2003 Accepted: 08 Feb 2004 First Online: 02 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Permissions Search Site Citation Jichun Zhang, Katherine M. Bergman, Hairuo Qing; Stratigraphic relationships between the Middle Devonian Shell Lake Member and the Upper Winnipegosis reef mounds, Saskatchewan Sub-basin. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 2004;; 52 (2): 156–176. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/52.2.156 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyBulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract The spatial distribution of the Shell Lake Member and its relationship with the Upper Winnipegosis reef mounds in the Saskatchewan Sub-basin record an important aspect of the transitional history of the Elk Point Basin from fully marine to desiccation. The Shell Lake Member in the study area is composed of anhydrite and laminated dolomite, and produces a good reflection on seismic profiles. The top of many Winnipegosis reef mounds gives a seismic reflection similar to the Shell Lake Member, leading to the interpretation in the literature that the Shell Lake Member is a continuous unit overlying the Winnipegosis reef mounds in the Sub-basin. Data presented in this paper demonstrate that the Shell Lake Member is not continuous because it terminates against the fully developed reef mounds. The anhydrite on top of the reef mounds previously interpreted as the Shell Lake Member is diagenetic anhydrite that occurs as replacement of the Winnipegosis carbonate at the top of reef mounds and as cement in the vugs. This interpretation is based on differences recorded in the depositional, lithological and diagenetic features of these two units. The formation of the diagenetic anhydrite of the Winnipegosis reef mounds is distinct from the primary depositional anhydrite in the Shell Lake Member based on the lithologic and diagenetic features, spatial distribution and stratigraphic relationship of the Winnipegosis carbonate and the Shell Lake Member in the study area. The spatial relationships of various lithologic units may serve as a predictor for the location of new Winnipegosis reef mounds and potash deposits. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».