Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Professor and Head, Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, F02.127, University Medical Center Utrecht, P.O. Box 85500, 3508 GA Utrecht, The Netherlands. Received on May 19, 2004; accepted on May 31, 2004. © CLINICALAND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY 2004. In this issue of Clinical and Experi mental Rheumatology an interesting report from Antalya, Turkey is published regarding the association of daily milk consumption with decreased occurrence of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (1). Kacar and colleagues interviewed 655 subjects with pain of the knee joint and asked amongst other things the frequency of consumed dietary elements. There are scarce data on the possible role of nutrition, though low intake of anti-oxidant vitamins (A, C, E) and vitamin D may be associated with increased risk of progression of established knee osteoarthritis (2), and reduced levels of vitamin D with increased risk of incident hip osteoarthritis (3). However, these associations are from much lower amplitude than the generally accepted susceptibility factors such as obesity, genetic factors, bone density or cigarette smoking (4). The interest in milk consumption was triggered by an earlier report of Colker et al. (5), who reported that daily consumption of a nutritional beverage containing milk-based micronutrients, vitamins (C, B12 and E) and minerals (iron, zinc) was beneficial in alleviating symptoms and dysfunction in subjects with osteoarthritis. They performed a study in 31 subjects with osteoarthritis of both knees, and randomised them into 2 groups, giving them 12 oz daily of the micronutrient-containing beverage, or a placebo for 6 weeks. The patients were instructed not to change their normal activities and diet. Bodyweight, vital signs, blood chemistries and adverse events were monitored to assess safety; these safety indicators remained unchanged in the test and placebo groups. The principal outcome measurement for efficacy was the Western Ontario McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), administered weekly. All these scores improved significantly over time in the micronutrient group, whereas only a few scores improved in the placebo group. The overall treatment eff e c t based on the WOMAC composite score was significant, though the effect size was moderate at 0.55. This has been a remarkable report, not confirmed by other studies yet. Of course the milkderived micronutrients were the ingredients of interest, but the tested beverage provided other nutritiens that might have contributed to the improved joint health, such as antioxidant activity from vitamin C and E, as has been suggested before (2). In any case these findings are interesting enough to warrant taking another look at a possible relationship between milk and symptomatic osteoarthritis. Kacar et al. performed an epidemiological study in the urban population of Antalya. Over 3000 persons were involved. A structured interview was performed in persons aged 50 or over. Patients were included when they experienced pain without swelling or warmth of the knee joint and answered positive on one or more of the following questions: 1. “Does the pain aggravate with motion and subside with rest ?” 2. “During the initial movement after rest, do you have stiffness at the knee joint lasting less than 15 minutes ?” By means of these questions a total of 655 subjects were identified. T h e s e were further invited for physical examination and X-ray of the knee joint (in most of the patients) at the hospital. Thus 97 patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis and 559 “without” osteoarthritis were identified. The frequency of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis was significantly lower in subjects who were daily milk consumers than in subjects who did not drink milk. T h i s could be in line with the observation of Colker et al. discussed above. However, before we can draw such a conclusion from this Turkish survey, we first have to consider other well-known risk factors for osteoarthritis. As expected, there were more women with osteoarthritis than men, but no data on the use of milk specific for women and men are given (do men drink more milk than women?). More importantly, in this study the authors did not measure weight, nor did they calculate the body mass index. No data on cigarette smoking, bone density and other factors are supplied either. Therefore it is very difficult to judge the value of the report. For instance, we must consider the hypothesis that socio-economic factors EDITORIAL Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 2004; 22: 387-388.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».