Enabling and Accelerating First Nations Telehealth Development in Canada
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
It is the AFN's position that a 100% investment ratio will enable and accelerate First Nations telemedicine services.This position is based on nation-wide consultations with First Nations, key informant interviews with provincial telemedicine principals and Canada Health Infoway Incorporated's (CHII's) investment record.The AFN asserts that CHII plays two complementary roles as an investor in First Nations Telehealth.The first role is enabler.CHII fulfills this role by investing in documentation, best practices, change management and management tools that reflect First Nations and Aboriginal circumstances, conditions and service models.The latter role is to "directly contribut [e] to increased utilization and expansion of telehealth services...in identified areas of need such as Aboriginal communities."The latter role addresses the need to prioritize telehealth service development in rural and remote First Nations and to accelerate their participation in regional health authority, provincial and federal telehealth systems and networks.While CHII has achieved some success as an enabler, its catalytic capacity is less clear.Accordingly, the AFN is concerned that the CHII telehealth investment program and criteria are dis-incenting First Nations and provincial partners from collaborating on sustainable telehealth development projects and, as a result, that the $17.5M First Nations investment envelope will be undersubscribed before the end of the program in December 2009.While complementary issues -such as the absence of FNIH operational funding for First Nations services, lack of First Nations telehealth policy and program leadership by FNIH, significant and ongoing human and system telehealth capacity gaps in remote First Nations, the high cost of connectivity and the generally poor state of the telecommunications infrastructure in or near First Nations territories -continue to mitigate against successful diffusion of telehealth innovations among First Nations, it is the position of the AFN that changes to CHII's investment ratio for First Nations telehealth and amendments to its investment requirements and eligibility criteria will substantively accelerate First Nations telehealth participation and First Nations capacity to integrate their needs and resources with federal and provincial partners.AFN support for First Nations telehealth services and systems is embedded in the First Nations Action Plan, the Aboriginal Health Blueprint and, recently, the Wait Times Road Map.Telehealth, in these contexts, provides an opportunity for First Nations to close long-time policy, program and health outcomes gaps by enabling strategic partnerships with F/P/T stakeholders, to increase First Nations health system influence and decisionmaking, to increase the level and quality of local health service delivery and to make more effective use of cross-jurisdictional health systems and scarce health human resources.Accordingly, the AFN views telehealth as a means for augmenting delivery of health services for achieving a more even distribution of health and wellness resources among First Nations and for supporting new health human resource opportunities in First Nations communities.In Fall 2006, the AFN's Health and Social Services Secretariat initiated discussions with CHII with the aim of increasing First Nation participation in the CHII telehealth A final section reviewed selection criteria and identified First Nations jurisdictions where potential 100% investment ratio projects are located.This version of the Position paper is focused on the first two sections.Section three and the Appendices have been removed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,007 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».