Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Work is fundamental to human society and modern organizations, and consequently has been central to the thinking of major social theorists and social science disciplines. This book offers a 'one-stop-shop' guide to classical and contemporary perspectvies of work written by leading international experts. Schools covered include: Weberian, Marxian, Durkheimian, feminist, neo-classical economics, institutional economics, ethics, Foucauldian, postmodernist, organizational sociology and economic sociology. Each chapter traces the origins of the theoretical school, reviews seminal contributions, and considers major criticisms of the approach. In addition, the book features a section on key aspects of work - professions, technology, identity and globalisation - to which these theories have been applied. The book makes a major contribution in a number of ways: DT Provides systematic coverage of major social and economic theories and the way they aid our understanding of work; DT Includes a section of chapters that consider, in an applied way, how social theories have helped the analysis of key substantive areas of work; DT Includes contributions from leading academics from both Europe and the USA; DT Each chapter can be read as free-standing summary of a particular school of theoretical approach; DT In addition, the introductory and concluding chapters examine themes cross-cutting the other chapters in the book. It is an essential text for academics and advanced students concerned with the sociology of work, management, and organization studies. Contributors to this volume - James Barker, , Professor of Organizational Theory and Strategy, Department of Management, U.S. Air Force Academy Jacques Belangerm Professor of Industrial Relations, Universite Laval Nicole Biggart, Jerome J. and Elsie Suran Chair in Technology Management and Professor of Management and Sociology, Graduate School of Management, University of California, Davis Gibson Burrell, Professor of Organization Theory and Head of the Management Centre, Universtiy of Leicester Peter Cappelli, George W. Taylor Professor of Management and Director, Center for Human Resources, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Paul Edwards, Professor of Industrial Relations, University of Warwick Steve Frenkel, Professor of Organizational Behaviour and Industrial Relations, Australian Graduate School of Management Heidi Gottfried, Associate Professor of Labor Studies and Sociology, Wayne State University Didier Guillot, Assistant Professor of Organisational Behaviour, INSEAD Heather Haveman, Professor of Management, Graduate School of Business, Columbia University Geoffrey Hodgson, Research Professor in Business Studies, University of Hertfordshire Randy Hodson, Professor of Sociology, Ohio State University Richard Hyman, Professor of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics and Political Science Marek Korczynski, Reader in Employment Relations, Loughborough University Karen Legge, Professor of Organisational Behaviour, Warwick Business School, University of Warwick Robin Leidner, Associate Professor of Sociology, University of Pennsylvania James Lincoln, Warren E. and Carol Spieker Professor of Leadership, University of California, Berekeley Keith Macdonald, Department of Scoiology, University of Surrey Steve Machin, Professor of Economics, University College London, and Director of the Centre for the Economics of Education and Research Director at the Centre for Economic Performance at the London School of Economics and Political Science Graham Sewell, Associate Professor, Department of Management, University of Melbourne
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».