Parakinesia Brachialis Oscitans: A Case Report
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
A 51-year-old man was admitted to the emergency room with an 8-hour history of sudden right hemiparesis. On examination, right upper extremity strength was graded as 1 proximally, 2 distally, 3 for the lower limb, and there were also right central facial paralysis and motor aphasia. He had a previous medical history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, type 2 diabetes, obesity, and a stroke 3 years before with mild residual right hemiparesis. A head CT showed a large fronto-parieto-temporal hypodense area consistent with a left middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory stroke (Fig. 1). A Doppler ultrasound of the carotid and vertebral arteries revealed occlusion of the left internal carotid artery. Arteriography confirmed the left MCA occlusion and revealed two critical intracranial stenosis in the right internal carotid artery. Electrocardiogram showed a slow atrial fibrillation, and an echocardiogram revealed a left ventricular intracavitary thrombus. Before admission, he was on acetyl salicylic acid 100 mg daily, subcutaneous regular insulin 30 U twice-daily, losartan 50 mg daily, and simvastatin 40 mg daily. After approximately 48 hours of admission, he developed patterned involuntary movements in the right upper limb during yawning. The movements, as shown in the video segment (see Video 1), consisted of simultaneous lifting of the entire right upper limb associated with tremor. Upon cessation of yawning, the limb returned to its resting, paretic position. The movement reoccurred continuously with every yawn, and during the episodes, the level of consciousness was preserved, as it was between them. The phenomena ceased spontaneously 12 hours after they were first noticed. The patient remained with the same neurological deficits throughout admission. He underwent proximal and distal right internal carotid artery angioplasty and subsequent anticoagulation targeting the intracavitary thrombus. Unfortunately, after a 2-month hospital stay complicated by recurrent episodes of pulmonary and urinary tract sepsis, the patient died as a result of septic shock. Here, we describe the phenomenon termed parakinesia braquialis oscitans (PBO), recently proposed by Walusinski et al.1 Descriptions of PBO are quite consistent, with jaw opening during the yawn, accompanied by elevation of the paretic limb, and subsequent drop upon ending the movement.1-3 This phenomenon typically occurs in the upper limbs and may be associated with milder concomitant movement of the lower extremity. In terms of localization of the correspondent brain injury, PBO has been associated with lesions that affect the internal capsule, and basal ganglia and their connections, ranging from cerebrovascular, demyelinating, infectious, and expansive lesions. From a timing perspective, most cases are acute; however, they have been described even within 6 months of the injury.4 Yawning is a stereotyped, involuntary, and repetitive movement observed in almost all vertebrates.4 It is believed that the paraventricular nucleus in hypothalamus plays a role in yawning, as well as medullary and pontine regions, with connections toward the frontal region and cervical spine. The movement is mediated by oxytocin neurons projecting to the hippocampus, reticular formation, and locus ceruleus in the brainstem, but other hormones and neurotransmitters potentially play a role, including serotonin, estrogens, hypocretin, and testosterone. Dopamine, excitatory amino acids, or even oxytocin itself can stimulate further release of oxytocin in these various subcortical structures triggering yawning. On the other hand, opioids can inhibit the oxytocinergic activation, preventing it.2, 5, 4 The pathophysiology of PBO is unknown, but there are at least three theories trying to explain it: (1) Subcortical structures disinhibited by the cerebral cortical damage might release the reticular brainstem formation interconnected with motor pathways, which can be activated by yawning; (2) an “emotional motor system” would be responsible for the involuntary movement of the hemiplegic limb and yawning would activate it as a consequence of an emotional state related to drowsiness, coactivating the bulbar and motor neurons in the brainstem2, 4; and (3) Walusinski et al.5 also propose a mechanism related to the connection between the respiratory peacemaker in pre-Botzinger complex in ventrolateral medulla of the brainstem and the lateral reticular nucleus during yawning. In this mechanism, the stereotyped movement may lead to lateral reticular nucleus stimulation inducing involuntary limb movement. The internal capsule is the most common lesion site related with PBO, which can be explained by a corticopontocerebellar tract lesion linking the cerebral cortex to the cerebellum by extrapyramidal motor system neurons. This pathway passes through the internal capsule on each side of the pyramidal tract. PBO is more likely to occur when the damage involves the first neuron of the tract interrupting not only corticospinal and corticonuclear pathways, but also the extrapyramidal corticostriate, corticorubral, corticonigral, and corticoreticular pathways.4 Joining anatomical and physiological observations, another possibility is that cases with previous lesions in the region homologous to the acute insult may be more prone to develop PBO. This a purely speculative observation that cannot be implied by a single observation, but may explain why PBO is almost never observed after large MCA strokes, given that most patients do not have previous pathology in the contralateral hemisphere. Although the case described here presented a tragic outcome, our review of the sparse literature on PBO does not provide enough substrate to indicate any consistent prognostic value. Also, PBO tends to disappear spontaneously or once motor recovery occurs.1 Overall, many questions remain unanswered regarding this intriguing semiological finding, including its clinical relevance, true prevalence, phenomenology, and physiological implications. (1) Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique. M.F.: 3A, 3B I.B.: 3A G.B.: 3A R.P.M.: 3A, 3B Funding Sources and Conflicts of Interest: The authors report no sources of funding and no conflicts of interest. Financial Disclosures for previous 12 months: The authors declare that there are no disclosures to report. A video accompanying this article is available in the supporting information here. Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,037 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».