MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1940482688 · doi:10.1353/jeu.2015.0004

Postmodern Picture Books, the Postmodernesque, and Queer Failure

2015· article· en· W1940482688 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Lian Beveridge

Notice bibliographique

RevueJeunesse Young People Texts Cultures · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueThemes in Literature Analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésQueerPostmodernismArtSociologyAestheticsLiteratureArt historyGender studies

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Postmodern Picture Books, the Postmodernesque, and Queer Failure Lian Beveridge (bio) Allan, Cherie. Playing with Picturebooks: Postmodernism and the Postmodernesque. Basingstoke: Palgrave, 2012. 216pp. $90.00 hc. ISBN 978-0-23031-949-3. Print. Critical Approaches to Children’s Literature. Bossio, Paula. The Line. Toronto: Kids Can, 2013. 32pp. $16.95 hc. ISBN 978-1-894786-84-3. Print. Clanton, Ben. Vote for Me! Toronto: Kids Can, 2012. 40pp. $18.95 hc. ISBN 978-1-55453-822-5. Print. Fagan, Cary. I Wish I Could Draw. Toronto: Groundwood, 2014. 32pp. $12.95 hc. ISBN 978-1-55498-318-6. Print. Maclear, Kyo. Virginia Wolf. Illus. Isabelle Arsenault. Toronto: Kids Can, 2012. 32pp. $18.95 hc. ISBN 978-1-55453-649-8. Print. Rogers, Stan. Northwest Passage. As seen by Matt James. Toronto: Groundwood, 2013. 56pp. $24.95 hc. ISBN 978-1-55498-153-3. Print. Watt, Mélanie. Chester’s Back! Toronto: Kids Can, 2013. 32pp. $9.95 pb. ISBN 978-1-55453-461-6. Print. Young, Cybele. Ten Birds. Toronto: Kids Can, 2011. 32pp. $18.95 hc. ISBN 978-1-55453-568-2. Print. [End Page 135] For those who study picture books, the postmodern picture book has a particular allure because of its promise to take this complex and versatile genre in new and unusual directions. Cherie Allan’s recent book-length study, Playing with Picturebooks: Postmodernism and the Postmodernesque, offers insight into this contested and fascinating area. Allan’s book was published by Palgrave Macmillan in 2012 as part of the Critical Approaches to Children’s Literature series edited by Kerry Mallan and Clare Bradford. The text offers a solid grounding on postmodernism and picture books, with chapters on modes of representation, reality, representations of the past, and difference. It analyzes a wide range of international picture books published between the 1980s and 2012. While Allan acknowledges that “the majority of children’s books still conform to a traditional modernist approach,” she argues that, “nevertheless, the influence of postmodernism on children’s picturebooks is significant and warrants an investigation” (19). She introduces, in her final chapter, the concept of “postmodernesque” picture books, noting that these are “not so much postmodern picturebooks as picturebooks about postmodernity” (141). She observes that “postmodernesque picturebooks have emerged from the postmodern tradition and yet exhibit a sufficient shift in direction to warrant a separate designation” (24). She offers several examples of such books as well as an illuminating discussion of how these picture books interact with the modern and the postmodern. Allan’s work is clearly written, and the new terminology she suggests is a fruitful way to think about contemporary picture books. Allan’s work provides a useful frame to consider seven picture books published by Canadian presses between 2011 and 2014. These picture books cover a wide range of topics, from Virginia Woolf’s childhood to a competitive election race, and represent a range of aesthetics, from delicate chiaroscuro illustrations to childlike pencil drawings. They all contain postmodern elements, some to a greater degree than others, and most illustrate an interest in the creative process, from drawing dragons with a Sharpie pen to building a catapult. Through an application of Allan’s work in conjunction with Judith Halberstam’s The Queer Art of Failure, I argue that, while the picture books meet Allan’s definition of postmodern and postmodernesque picture books only in some ways, they do offer radical possibilities through their failures. As we know, the term “postmodern” is contested and shifting, and inherently resists definition. As Allan notes, “[f]ew terms have been subjected to such intense debate as has postmodernism” (6). Nonetheless, she offers several useful ways to conceive of the postmodern picture book. Many of the picture books reviewed here fit the genre because of their use of metafiction. As Allan explains, “metafiction refers to self-reflexive fiction which intentionally draws attention to its status as fiction [End Page 136] and, in so doing, poses questions about the relationship between fiction and the reality it purports to represent” (27). Several of the picture books draw attention to their status as fiction in that they are books about making a book. I Wish I Could Draw, published...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCommunication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,785
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,235
Écart entre enseignants0,222 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJeunesse Young People Texts CulturesMême sujetThemes in Literature AnalysisTravaux en français237 207