Studies on Recombinational Variability for Combining Ability Among F4 Barbadense Lines
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The present study was aimed at evaluating recombinational variability for combining ability in F4 generation. To assess variability for combining ability, twenty eight F4 (Gossypium barbadense L.) lines were crossed with four common diverse testers (Gossypium hirsutum L.) viz., DH 98-27 (T1), ZCH8 (T2), 178-24 (T3) and DH 18-31 (T4) for use in assessing the variability for combining ability. The entire experimental material was planted on a medium black soil at College of Agriculture, Dharwad under irrigated condition. All the 53 F5 (included Suvin variety as check) barbadense lines, four hirsutum testers and derived F1 crosses along with the straight crosses (Bench Mark Crosses (BMC)) and ruling commercial checks (MRC 6918 Bt check and DCH 32 non Bt check) were sown during kharif 2011 in a Randomized Block Design with two replications and a spacing of 90 cm between rows and 60 cm between the plants within a row. Among the barbadense lines (males), the mean sum of squares (MSS) were not significant for all the characters except mean boll weight, reproductive points on sympodia and seed cotton yield which showed highly significant differences, while number of bolls per plant and ginning outturn exhibited significant differences. Among the hirsutum testers (females) exhibited not significant difference for all the characters except number of bolls per plant and seed cotton yield which recorded highly significant differences, while mean boll weight and transpiration rate showed significant differences. Line x Tester interaction were highly significant differences for number of monopodia per plant, number of bolls per plant, mean boll weight, reproductive points on sympodia, seed index, lint index, photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate, while seed cotton yield had significant differences. The estimates of variance due to general combining ability (GCA), variance due to specific combining ability (SCA), the magnitude of SCA variances were greater than GCA variance for all 14 characters and the variance ratio was less than half in these traits, indicating that dominance variance was more than additive variance for these characters. For seed cotton yield, eight lines recorded significant gca effects, of which five lines exhibited positive significant gca effects. The highest gca effect was found by the line DB 533 x DB 534 F4 IPS 8 (363.15). Among the testers, the tester DH 98-27 had positive significant gca effect (94.65) and the tester DH 18-31 showed positive gca effect (35.44), while 178-24 (-77.43) recorded negative significant gca effect. Two crosses manifested positive significant sca effects, of which the cross DH 98-27 X (DB 534 x DB 533 F4 IPS 22) (680.34) recorded the highest positive sca effect. Based on weighted gca method ,the most potential combiners were found to be the lines DB 533 x DB 534 F4 IPS 26, DB 533 x DB 534 F4 IPS 17, DB 533 x DB 534 F4 IPS 8 and DB 533 x DB 534 F4 IPS 32 . Among the testers, the tester DH 18-31 based on weighted gca method is the most potential parent Key word: Recombinational variability, F4 barbadense lines, hirsutum testers, gca, sca
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».