MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1947139221

A Challenge to the Social Economy Ecosystem: Social Enterprise Access to Current Government Services for Small & Medium Size Enterprises (SME)

2012· article· en· W1947139221 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David LePage, Andrea Di Lucca

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique sociale · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBusinessSocial enterpriseSocial economyGovernment (linguistics)Small and medium-sized enterprisesProfit (economics)Small businessSocial businessEnterprise planning systemEconomic growthMarketingPublic relationsFinanceMarket economyEconomicsPolitical science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Upon recognizing the significant role that Social Enterprise has on the overall social economy ecosystem, a collaboration of social economy actors and organizations convened the BC Social Enterprise Policy Forum in late 2007. The forum brought together social economy practitioners, funders, academics, and other non-profit and social economy players. It identified four pillars required to create a supportive policy environment for social enterprise:* Support the development of business skills in the non-profit sector* Show the value of social enterprise through research* Provide access to the appropriate financing along the entire business development path* Develop market opportunitiesMany initiatives have used this policy framework to move forward on supporting the development and success of social enterprises (Enterprising Non-profits, 2011a). This paper examines one specific policy and recommends adjustments to it, in order to build the business capacity of non-profit organizations, thus strengthening the Social Enterprise sector. Specifically, we are interested in the following question: What are the opportunities and barriers for non-profit businesses to have equal access to existing Small / Medium Size (SME) business planning and development services funded by the Federal / Provincial / Territorial governments? As will be described in this paper, Enterprising Non-Profits (enp) examined the criteria, policies, and practices of accessing the services of nearly 100 existing Federal, Provincial, and Territorial Small & Medium sized business support programs.BackgroundSmall and medium size enterprises (SMEs) are essential to the economic and employment health of urban and rural communities across Canada. Industry Canada indicates that Canadian SMEs deliver 60% of Canada's economic output, 85% of new jobs, and employ almost 6.8 million, or 64 %, of private sector employees. The federal, provincial, and territorial governments (F/P/T) recognize the value of SMEs by providing a full range of business development supports, resources, and tools to help them achieve success. These services include business planning, advisory services, investments, investor incentives, market development, and management support.Imagine the community impact and tax savings if we could address, even partially, the social and economic impacts of homelessness, welfare, health care, and the justice system. What if we could employ many of the people caught in these circumstances because they do not fit the current normal work place environment? Are we interested in supporting the person who is often leftout of employment because of a physical disability, facing mental health challenges, struggling with or recovering from addiction, or coming back after a spell of bad luck? These conditions represent unemployment by circumstance and lack of opportunity, they are not unemployment by choice; however, they still lead to personal isolation, poverty, health issues, and the community or government supports and costs created by those factors. Yet, we continue to struggle with community problems when one solution is right in front of us: using business models to create social value. Social enterprise is an answer with immediate and preventative benefits that can serve many persons in need, save government a lot of money, and create a more just and sustainable economy and society (O'Connor, Elson, Hall & Reimer, 2012).Social enterprises are businesses operated by non-profit organizations for the blended purpose of generating income from sales and creating a social value (Social Enterprise Council of Canada, 2012). They are engaged in multiple business sectors including retail, manufacturing, business services, arts and culture, family services, and food services. By the very nature of their size, they are SMEs as well. They work across industries, from catering and couriers, from recycling to manufacturing and building services, and on and on. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,019
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,969
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,088

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,019
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0140,020
Communication savante0,0230,025
Science ouverte0,0020,020
Intégrité de la recherche0,0110,010
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,289
Écart entre enseignants0,259 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Review of Social Policy / Revue canadienne de politique socialeMême sujetEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesTravaux en français237 207