High alpha‐1 antitrypsin clearance predicts severity of gut graft‐versus‐host disease (GVHD) in children
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The clinical evaluation and management of gut GVHD is a significant challenge in pediatric HSCT. It is often difficult to obtain pathological evidence to confirm diagnosis and/or to determine response to treatment. The severity of the disease itself may not be related to just the classic symptom of diarrhea. The objectives of this study were to prospectively evaluate patients with suspected gut GVHD for PLE as measured by AATC in stools at two different times for each patient and to compare the severity of the PLE with the severity of clinical acute gut GVHD. Thirteen patients were suspected of gut GVHD by clinical criteria (diarrhea > 10 mL/kg/24 h); one patient was excluded for being unable to complete the stool collection. Therefore, 12 patients, 10 boys and two girls, were studied. Median stool volume was 27.5 mL/kg/day (range 10.1-109.0).The median age at BMT was 11.1 yr (range 3.9-17.0 yr). All patients had negative stool electron microscopy for viruses and cultures for C. difficile on their first collection. Nine patients (75%) had two 24-h stool collections performed at a median of eight days apart (range 7-14 days). At the time of the first collection, six patients had ≥ stage 2 acute gut GVHD, and at second collection, four patients had ≥ stage 2 gut GVHD and four collections were of non-diarrheal stool (hence treatment response). Median AATC from all 21 collections was 19.0 mL/day (range 3.0-561.0), and levels >22 mL/day indicate the diagnosis of PLE. The four children initially suspected of GVHD but who had a negative biopsy completed a total of five collections with a median AATC of 5.0 mL/day (range 3.0-16.0) vs. a median of 33.5 for the remainder of the collections (range 3-561). Stage of gut GVHD correlated with elevated AATC and with stool volume. AATC > 22 mL/day showed a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 82% for significant gut GVHD (≥ stage 2). Seven stool collections were taken at ≥ stage 3 gut GVHD; six of those seven patients were positive for PLE. Larger stool volumes were more predictive, and five collections with stool volumes >30 mL/kg/day were positive for PLE. We conclude that a significant positive correlation exists between the severity of PLE and the stage of gut GVHD (p < 0.04), particularly obvious in patients with stages 2-4 GVHD (p = 0.03). Despite the small number of patients recruited, this study emphasizes the need to consider PLE as a useful aspect of the clinical picture. We suggest that in order to see a response to therapy and therefore a decrease in AATC, clinicians should wait at least 2 wk from the initiation of therapy before repeating AATC test. In light of the significant morbidity and mortality associated with ≥ stage 2 gut GVHD, and as an important therapeutic decision for these patients, one may consider evaluating AATC if a biopsy is not an option.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».