Commentary for history special issue of <i>Research Synthesis Methods</i>

Research Synthesis MethodsVolume 6, Issue 3 p. 268-271 Commentary Commentary for history special issue of Research Synthesis Methods Iain Chalmers, Corresponding Author Iain Chalmers James Lind Initiative, Oxford, OX2 7LG UK Correspondence to: Iain Chalmers, James Lind Initiative, Oxford, OX2 7LG, UK [email protected]Search for more papers by this author Iain Chalmers, Corresponding Author Iain Chalmers James Lind Initiative, Oxford, OX2 7LG UK Correspondence to: Iain Chalmers, James Lind Initiative, Oxford, OX2 7LG, UK [email protected]Search for more papers by this author First published: 10 June 2015 https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1144Citations: 1Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Antman EM, Lau J, Kupelnick B, Mosteller F, Chalmers TC. 1992. A comparison of results of meta-analyses of randomized control trials and recommendations of clinical experts. JAMA 268: 240–248. Chalmers I. 1979. Randomized Controlled Trials of Fetal Monitoring 1973–1977. In O Thalhammer, K Baumgarten, A Pollak. (eds.). Perinatal Medicine (pp. 260–265). Stuttgart: Georg Thieme. Chalmers I. 2013. Health Research Authority's great leap forward on UK trial registration. BMJ 3479:f5776 Chalmers I, Altman DG. 1995. Systematic Reviews. London: BMJ Publications. Chalmers I, Nylenna M. 2014. A new network to promote evidence-based research. Lancet 384: 1903–04. Chalmers I, Hedges LV, Cooper H. 2002. A brief history of research synthesis. Evaluation and the Health Professions 25: 12–37. Chalmers I, Bracken MB, Djulbegovic B, Garattini S, Grant J, Gulmezoglu AM, Ioannidis JPA, Oliver S. 2014. How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set. Lancet 383: 7–16. Chalmers TC, Matta RJ, Smith H, Kunzler A-M. 1977. Evidence favoring the use of anticoagulants in the hospital phase of acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 297: 1091–96. Clarke M, Hopewell S, Chalmers I. 2007. Reports of clinical trials should begin and end with up-to-date systematic reviews of other relevant evidence: a status report. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 100: 187–190. Cooper HM. 1982. Scientific principles for conducting integrative research reviews. Review of Educational Research 52: 291–302. Daniels M, Hill AB. 1952. Chemotherapy of pulmonary tuberculosis in young adults: an analysis of the combined results of three medical research council trials. BMJ 1: 1162–1168. Davis JM. 1976. Overview: maintenance therapy in psychiatry: II. Affective disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 133: 1–13. Dickersin K, Chalmers F. 2014. Thomas C. Chalmers (1917–1995): a pioneer of randomized clinical trials and systematic reviews. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation (www.jameslindlibrary.org). Dickersin K, Chalmers I. 2010. Recognising, investigating and dealing with incomplete and biased reporting of clinical research: from Francis Bacon to the World Health Organisation. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation (www.jameslindlibrary.org). Feldman KA. 1971. Using the work of others: some observations on reviewing and integrating. Sociology of Education 44: 86–102. Glass GV. 1976. Primary, secondary and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher 10: 3–8. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD. 2009. Medicine's methodological debt to the social sciences. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation (www.jameslindlibrary.org). Health Research Authority. 2014. Guidance. Guidance: specific questions that need answering when considering the design of clinical trials. Available from: http://www.hra.nhs.uk/documents/2014/05/guidance-questions-considerations-clinical-trials.pdf (accessed Nov 18, 2014). Jenicek M. 1987. Méta-analyse en médecine. Évaluation et synthèse de l'information clinique et épidémiologique. [Meta-analysis in medicine: evaluation and synthesis of clinical and epidemiological information]. St.Hyacinthe and Paris: EDISEM and Maloine Éditeurs. Jenicek M. 2006. Méta-analyse en médecine: the first book on systematic reviews in medicine. JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation (www.jameslindlibrary.org). Kleinert S, Benham L, Collingridge D, Summerskill W, Horton R. 2014. Further emphasis on research in context. Lancet 384: 2176–77. Leitch I. 1959. The Place of Analytical and Critical Reviews in Any Growing Biological Science and the Service they may Render to Research. Proceedings of the International Conference on Scientific Information, 2 Vols. Washington DC: National Academies Press, p. 571-588. Light RJ, Pillemer DB. 1984. Summing up. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Light RJ, Smith PV 1971. Accumulating evidence: procedures for resolving contradictions among research studies. Harvard Educational Review 41: 429–471. Mahoney MJ. 1977. Publication prejudices: an experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system. Cognitive Therapy and Research 1: 161–75. Moher D, Glasziou P, Chalmers I, Nasser M, Bossuyt PMM, Korevaar DA, Graham ID, Ravaud P, Boutron I. In preparation. Increasing value, reducing waste in biomedical research: who's listening. National Institute for Health Research. 2013. Guidance notes for applicants that ensure all primary research is informed by a review of the existing literature. Version 5. May. Available from: http://www.nets.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/77217/Guidance-notes_literature-review.pdf (accessed Nov 18, 2014). Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV, Mantel N, McPherson K, Peto J, Smith PG. 1977. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examples. British Journal of Cancer 35: 1–39. Park WH, Bullowa JGM, Rosenbluth NM. 1928. The treatment of lobar pneumonia with refined specific antibacterial serum. JAMA 91: 1503–1508. Petrosino A. 2004. Charles Frederick [Fred] Mosteller (1916–2006). JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation (www.jameslindlibrary.org). Pratt JG, Rhine JB, Smith BM, Stuart CE, Greenwood JA. 1940. Extra-Sensory Perception after Sixty Years: A Critical Appraisal of the Research in Extra-Sensory Perception. New York: Henry Holt. Rosenthal R. 1979. The 'file drawer problem' and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 86: 638–641. Simes RJ. 1986. Publication bias: the case for an international registry of clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology 4: 1529–41. Smart RG. 1964. The importance of negative results in psychological research. Canadian Psychologist 5: 225–232. Smith ML, Glass GV. 1977. Meta-analysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. American Psychologist 32: 752–760. Smith A, Traganza E, Harrison G. 1969. Studies on the effectiveness of antidepressant drugs. Psychopharmacol Bulletin (suppl) 1-53: 1–20. Sterling TD. 1959. Publication decisions and their possible effects on inferences drawn from tests of significance – or vice versa. Journal of the American Statistical Association 54: 30–34. Stjernswärd J. 1974. Decreased survival related to irradiation postoperatively in early breast cancer. Lancet 304: 1285–1286. Stjernswärd J. 2009. Meta-analysis as a manifestation of 'bondförnuft' ('peasant sense'). JLL Bulletin: Commentaries on the history of treatment evaluation (www.jameslindlibrary.org). Wechsler H, Grosser GH, Greenblatt M. 1965. Research evaluating antidepressant medications on hospitalized mental patients: a survey of published reports during a five-year period. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 141: 231–239. Citing Literature Volume6, Issue3Special Issue: The Origins of Modern Meta‐analysisSeptember 2015Pages 268-271 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.