MétaCan
← tous les travaux

10.1016/0967-0653(96)80394-2

2000· article· en· 60 citations· W1949491860 sur OpenAlex· 10.1016/0967-0653(96)80394-2

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Revue canadienneIl a paru dans une revue canadienne.

Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.

strate : venue_new · poids de sondage : 2684.25 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Nutrient budget study of an estuary and its catchment; environmental science.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

It investigates nutrient flows in an estuary and catchment, not research itself.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Environmental nutrient budget of an estuary; domain science, not research as object.

Résumé

Dry and wet season phosphorus and nitrogen budgets for the Moresby Estuary and catchment are constructed to interpret cause-effect relationships between catchment land use and nutrient loads in the coastal waterways of the Great Barrier Reef region. Samples were collected during seasonal extremes to reflect as wide a range of conditions as possible. Smaller scale processes cannot be resolved at this level of nutrient balance due to large budget uncertainties. However, the nutrient budget does give an insight into catchment scale processes. Fertilizer application on cane land in the catchment is the dominant source of phosphorus (about 3,566 ± 735 x 10 3 moles) and nitrogen (about 79,330 ± 11,338 x 10 3 moles), contributing 88 times more phosphorus and nitrogen to the catchment than is supplied by other sources (e.g., septic tanks, atmospheric fallout, natural runoff and natural springs). However, only about 4 ± 2% of the phosphorus and about 11 ± 7% of the nitrogen added to the catchment is transferred to the estuary. About 82% of the phosphorus and about 90% of the nitrogen flux from the catchment occurs during the wet season. Once in the estuary, only small amounts of phosphorus and nitrogen are retained with most of the phosphorus being transferred to the ocean and it is suggested that most of the nitrogen may be used biologically. The fact that the Moresby Estuary is not a strong sink for nutrients (i.e., it is not becoming eutrophic with time) suggests that current levels of agricultural activity in the catchment can be maintained without adverse effects on ecological components of the estuary and catchment.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
Time to knit
Thématique
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Domaine
Environmental Science
Établissements canadiens
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
EstuaryEnvironmental scienceEutrophicationNutrientPhosphorusHydrology (agriculture)Surface runoffDrainage basinWet seasonSink (geography)Dry seasonCatchment areaEcologyGeographyGeologyBiologyChemistry
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui