MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1953646767 · doi:10.36834/cmej.36612

So you married a doctor? Preparing trainees for medical marriages

2013· article· en· W1953646767 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Monica L. Lypson, Rachel Perlman, Paula T. Ross

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Medical Education Journal · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueDiversity and Career in Medicine
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésGraduation (instrument)Merge (version control)Medical educationMedical schoolPopulationFamily medicinePsychologyMedicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Most medical marriages occur before graduation from medical school; however, many medical students are unaware of the unique challenges associated with careers in medicine (e.g., financial insecurity, fatigue, stress, academic trouble, etc.) as they prepare to merge their careers with marriage or other long term relationships.1 Physician relationships in both the United States and Canada typically mirror national relationship trends in the larger population with a few exceptions.2–4 For example, physicians entering marriage tend to be older and divorce rates may be gender specific; the divorce rate for female physicians is higher than male physicians, the marriage rate is higher for female physicians than non-physician females, and approximately half of female physicians marry other physicians.5 Recently, both the Liaison Committee on Medical School and the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada included requirements toward helping trainees better manage their health and wellness. In the United States the focus is on medical student wellness and programs to promote the well-being of medical students and facilitate their adjustment to the physical and emotional demands of medical education.6 The CanMEDS 2005 Framework, under the competency of “professional”, requires a commitment to physician health.7 Trainees remain curious about how medical marriages function in real life, including the challenges of balancing the demands of work, personal relationships and children; however they are typically provided with little insight to help guide them. Given that medical school is the time when many students are beginning marriages or other long term partnerships, we developed a workshop for medical students to explore these issues using an encouraging approach to highlight the positive aspects of relationships to promote trainee wellness through a focus on work-family balance in physician domestic partnerships. The workshop explored existing literature in this area along with first-hand accounts from physician couples. We targeted topics such as managing the “Super Couple Syndrome”, the “Good Enough Mother” and identifying potential relationship threats. We also addressed protective actions such as managing stress, remaining engaged in the relationship, paying attention to parenting, and implementing communication methods that enhance friendship and intimacy. 8 Individuals from single- and dual-physician marriages as well as same-sex partnerships were invited to discuss their relationship experiences and the implications of medical marriages. They also discussed potential barriers and challenges to managing their own personal and professional lives. Invitees also answered questions addressing medical students’ concerns about the challenges and struggles that come from maintaining a relationship when starting a career in medicine, such as career decisions and the role of physicians in intimate relationships. Our evaluations revealed that the trainees found the workshop useful in getting candid advice from real people who have experienced dual career domestic partnerships and also helped them recognize the importance of giving considerations to future work-family balance and potentially lifestyles that may be unique to certain specialties. Both faculty and trainees affirmed that it was critical to provide doctors-in-training with exposure to issues of work-family balance as they prepare for their future careers in medicine. Faculty participants also stated the workshop gave them the opportunity to reflect on their career path and appropriate work-life balance, and provided the opportunity to listen to their spouses’ perceptions and attitudes about their career and relationship. Ultimately, the exposure to evidence-based information on work-life balance and the candid advice from real people who have “gone the course” helped trainees better recognize this area of physician wellness.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,030
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,099

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,018
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0300,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,310
Écart entre enseignants0,296 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2013
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Medical Education JournalMême sujetDiversity and Career in MedicineTravaux en français237 207