Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Orchestrating Impacts & ResistanceDonna Baines & Stephen McBride (Eds.), Halifax & Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing, 2014.Donna Baines and Stephen McBride's edited book on addresses one of most important issues of current political economy in western societies: austerity, policy of cutting state budgets to promote growth, has been preferred policy in all OECD countries, since 2008 financial crisis.In this sense, debate about is continues to be highly relevant in all western countries. Orchestrating Impacts and Resistance is result of a workshop organized by Research Group at McMaster University in Canada. It succeeds in positioning itself as a substantial contribution from different Canadian fields of expertise to discuss, in both practical and intellectual terms, not only global context of austerity, but also by applying an interesting and perceptive analysis of Canada's neoliberal politics in its various forms and intensities.Arguably, this edited book offers several scholarly written pieces on with a good overview of literature and critiques. It is highly recommended for those interested in a critical understanding of political economy of austerity, from a Canadian perspective. The book is structured into four parts, offering significant experiences of resistance, with a total of fourteen chapters from scholars, labour organizers and activists from all Canada.Baines and McBride set out aims and objectives of book with an introductory overview of austerity, both historical and theoretically. They question whether is something new about austerity, or if it can be just considered as a new wave of previously existing forms of neoliberalism (pp. 1-19).Part one addresses the context of The chapters under this section explore shift to austerity, its applicability and incidence not only in Europe but also in Canada. Some chapters are more convincing than others. For example, MacBride's chapter In Austerity We Trust (pp. 10-20) is a scholarly written piece, in which he offers a good overview of literature on austerity, notably a critique of Blyth's approach, one of world's leading scholars on austerity. McBride pitches his arguments perfectly, despite his title sounding suspiciously like pop economics. I also found some contradictions with Mark Blyth's book Austerity: The History of a Dangerous Idea. For example, McBride says that there is nothing new in practice or in theory about austerity (pp. 13; 15). However, Mark Blyth has convincingly demonstrated that is a powerful idea rooted in political ideology with its own empirical foundations as well theoretical basis.Part two of this edited book seeks to explore some of Contradictions of in terms of gender equality, unionism, social democracy and class struggle. The chapters under this section help to understand some of feminist critiques of neoliberalism, by rethinking and deconstructing discourse of austerity. These chapters also conflate perspectives from labour movement and social unionism to re-invent solidarity in times of austerity. This interesting discussion within this section helps to outline provocative thesis of this edited book. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,019 |
| Communication savante | 0,017 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,007 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,005 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,013 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».