Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The recent, and ongoing, large losses on derivatives transactions announced by UK corporates and the ensuing fears for systemic risk, highlight the need for focused research on derivative practices and corporate risk management activity in particular. This paper provides a descriptive analysis of the derivative practices of UK non-financial institutions, and attempts to evaluate whether these practices are consistent with value maximizing behaviour. Starting from the basic Modigliani and Miller Capital Structure proposition, more recent academic works on the subject are reviewed and analysed in the light of market Imperfections. Unlike previously published UK based research, this study encompasses a broad spectrum of both derivative instruments and companies surveyed, and offers a wider picture of derivative activity. The paper starts with an analysis of potential benefits and pitfalls of derivative instruments in risk management. The results of a survey, sent to 629 of the 637 corporates listed in the FTSE actuaries as of 1 April 1998 are discussed and compared to existing surveys which report mainly from North American markets. As a whole, the derivatives activity of UK corporates appears to be fairly similar to that of Canadian and US firms, but is still limited in view of the potential benefits that can be derived from their use in risk management. Small firms in particular do not seem to take advantage of the products available to manage their exposure to financial price risks, and initial findings suggest that this is because of a lack of knowledge in derivatives. The results support a positive relationship between derivative usage and firm size and a strong positive correlation between interest rate derivatives usage and firm size. Results also confirm that a significant proportion of firms appear to take unnecessary chances on financial markets using derivatives, although as expected, UK corporates do not use equity derivatives. Finally, although large firms seem to have adopted fairly consistent practices towards derivatives’ risk management; smaller firms have a far less consistent approach. Indeed, a significant number of them also do not appear to report their activity to the board of directors, and/or do not have a policy covering the use of these instruments.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle