Response to Xue and Colleagues
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editor: We thank Dr. Xue et al.1 for their interest in our article and appreciate the opportunity to respond to their questions regarding our study.2 Individuals with dementia are frequently excluded from surgical clinical trials. Observational studies such as ours provide important information for clinicians about the effect of anesthesia on early postoperative outcomes that would otherwise be unavailable. In response to the specific questions that Xue and colleagues raise, we would like first to address the questions regarding blood transfusions and acute kidney injury. Previous meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials have failed to find a significant difference in the risk of red blood cell transfusions or acute kidney injury associated with anesthetic technique for hip fracture surgery.3, 4 Therefore, although both of these adverse outcomes after hip fracture are potentially important, it was decided not to include them in the analysis. Functional status preceding surgery is a known risk factor for poor postoperative outcomes after hip fracture surgery.5, 6 Most administrative databases, including the ones used for the current study, do not contain detailed measures of functional impairment. A previous study that examined the effect of functional impairment measures on predicting hip fracture outcomes found that measures of functional impairment can improve prediction of adverse outcomes after hip fracture surgery but that the magnitude of improved predictive ability is less than in a model that includes only age, sex, and medical comorbidities.5 Therefore, although there may have been confounding due to unmeasured functional impairment in our study, functional impairment is unlikely to have had a significant effect on outcomes observed in our study.2 It was hypothesized that anesthetic technique might lead to some intraoperative complications that Xue and colleagues mentioned (e.g., hypotension, hypoxemia), which would then act as mediators of major postoperative complications such as mortality and intensive care unit admission. Therefore, adjusting for these intraoperative complications, which are in the causal pathway between anesthesia and outcomes, would obscure any associations between anesthetic technique and major early postoperative outcomes, which was the focus of our study.2 Although Xue and colleagues raised several important points regarding our study, the results of the study are valid, and there appears to be little difference in early major postoperative adverse outcomes associated between general anesthesia and regional anesthesia in older adults with dementia undergoing hip fracture surgery.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,006 | 0,059 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,005 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,005 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,032 | 0,039 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,026 | 0,023 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».