Palpation and dorsal acetabular rim radiographic view for early detection of canine hip dysplasia
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Summary The objectives of this study were to standardize a palpation technique and to determine within and between examiners, the repeatability in interpreting the angle of reduction, subluxation and the acetabular slope measurements. Also it was desired to ascertain the effect of pelvis positioning on the acetabular slope measurement on sixmonth- old dogs. On palpation examination fifty-three (53) dogs had their angles of reduction and subluxation measured. A radiographic examination including a standard hip-extended view, a compression and a distraction view and a dorsal acetabular rim view were performed on each dog. The within examiner repeatability was excellent for both the angle of reduction and subluxation (r = 0.975, p = 0.82 and r = 0.977, p = 0.81 respectively). The between examiners repeatability was good for the angle of reduction (r = 0.843, p = 0.51) but only a fair correlation was found for the angle of subluxation (r = 0.652, p = 0.83). For the acetabular slope measurement, an excellent within examiner correlation was observed (r = 0.940, p = 0.52). However, though a good correlation was found between examiners, a significant difference was found in the measurements of the three examiners (r = 0.780, p < 0.0001). The under- or overrotation position slightly changed the slope measurement but a fair correlation was still observed with the perfect position (r = 0.769, p = 0.074 and r = 0.684, p = 0.061 respectively). If the pelvis is turned to one side, a correlation was not found (r = 0.090, p = 0.847). The high repeatability of the angle of reduction measurement in six-month-old dogs suggests that it may be used by multiple examiners, with the expectation of comparable and consistent results. The modified method of the acetabular slope measurement improved the correlation, but a significant difference was still observed between examiners. Early detection in life of canine hip dysplasia is important. The angle of reduction and the acetabular slope have been evaluated as diagnostic tools. With regard to its repeatability between examiners, the use of the angle of reduction by multiple examiners will be acceptable. The correlation between examiners in the acetabular slope measurement was good but a significant difference was present. Part two is now being analyzed.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».