MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1961710653

The Oklahoma Academy of Science in Relation to The Advancement of Science and Research in Oklahoma

2015· article· en· W1961710653 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Charles Elijah Decker

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of Science · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineAgricultural and Biological Sciences
ThématiqueBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésAttendanceLibrary scienceQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryPolitical scienceLawArchaeologyComputer science
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Oklahoma Academy of SCience has a relatively short bistol7 reach1ng back only about a quarter of a century to 1909. A meet1na was called In Oklahoma City on December 30 and 31, by Dr. H. H. lAne, former professor of zoology here. Twenty-one scientists responded to the caU, gave 10 papers and organiZed tile Academy. At the ftrst annual meettna at the University of Oklahoma on November 25 and 26, 1910, 33 papers were presented and the secretary reported that was every reason tor congratulations uPOn the good start the Academy had made:' '.lbe papers presented at the ftrst meeting 1nd1cated that capable research students were not laclting In Oklahoma. The second annual meetma at Edmond was well attended. and much interest taken in the work of the AcademY. The tilird annual meeting was at St1llwater, and the fourth at Enid, where the attendance was small, the spirit of the papers and discUSSion indicated. that the Academy was reach1ng its atm. MU81c and readings were added. to the program and 19 new members were elected. During the next ten years meetings were not held in 191., 1918 and 1919, but on each ot the other years 30 to 40 papers were presented at each meeting, except in 1917 when 62 titles were l18ted; on this program maD1 of the members gave 2 or 3 papers each, and one mind was 80 proU11c as to produce 6 papers. The secretary's report tor 1910 1nd1cates that 46 names were presented for membership at the organization meeting and 73 were added dur1nl the year making a total of 118 of which 99 quaU11ed. by payment of dues. From 1913 to 1921 the meetings were held in Oklahoma City in connection with the Oklahoma State Teacher's Assoc:1ation, and on the latter date the membership reached 176. At ttlat time an estimate was made that about 100 other sclentJsts in the state were eligible for member8h1p. In 1925 there were 125 members and in 1930 and 1931 there were 355, but in the tollowing two years there was a net loss of 115 reducing the membership to 240. After losses were counted. for last year, 100 were added to the llst of members, br1Dg1ng it up again to 340. We are hop1ns that something over 60 additional members wUl be secured thia year, 80 tilat after any withdrawals, there may be a membership of 400. In the present memberab1p list of 340, 130 are at the University of Oklahoma about one-third that number at A. and M. Colleie, one.. fourtb In Oklahoma City, and one-sixth at Tulsa. seven 18 the b2a.he8t number trom any other place and at eilht places there are onl7 one or two members. All of the univers1ttea and colleges ot the state, ezcept Southeastern state Teachers' college at Durant, have bad representatives in the Acac1emY, and tb1s institution 18 now represented by a new mAJD.ber. The few and spanely scattered members in a large nu.mber ot the collepa Indicates something ot the poss1b1l1t1es ot growth for the Academy when all departments become as tully represented. 81 possible. Wh11e the writer baa been in correspondence for the past two )'earl with members 111 each of the universities and colleeeBt urging cooperat1oD in develop_ the pro.. P'&ID8 for the meettna:a and. of 1ncreaa1D8 the membel'Bbip, there ja need for much personal work in each ODe of these 1Dst1tutfona to bulld up the lDtereata of tile AcadelD7, so tbat it IDaY tunct10n in the most ettJcIent

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,020
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,703
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0200,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,011
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,031
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0040,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,111
Tête enseignante GPT0,335
Écart entre enseignants0,223 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueProceedings of the Oklahoma Academy of ScienceMême sujetBotany, Ecology, and Taxonomy StudiesTravaux en français237 207