MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1963546990 · doi:10.1353/ecf.2001.0037

Frances Sheridan Reads John Home: Placing Sidney Bidulph in the Republic of Letters

2001· article· en· W1963546990 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Betty A. Schellenberg

Notice bibliographique

RevueEighteenth-Century Fiction · 2001
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueLiterature: history, themes, analysis
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésRelation (database)Public sphereCitizenshipPower (physics)PublicityHistorySociologyLawLiteratureClassicsPoliticsPhilosophyArtPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Frances Sheridan Reads John Home: Placing Sidney Bidulph in the Republic of Letters Betty A. Schellenberg In his article on "Gender and the Public/Private Distinction in the Eighteenth Century," Lawrence E. Klein questions the "domestic thesis" put forwardby many feministhistories ofthe eighteenth century, athesis which employs the two binary oppositions of male/female and public/private to account for "the persistent exclusion of women from public roles, power, and citizenship." Klein notes that this model fails to take into account evidence that "even when theory was against them, women of the eighteenth century had [conscious] public dimensions to their lives." He goes on to suggest that such public dimensions are made conceptually possible by the multiple sets of distinctions from which individual identities are constructed, and that "a more precise account ofgender in relation to publicity and privacy can be achievedby closer examination ofboth space and language."1 Klein's critique seems to me particularly appropriate for studies of women novelists participating in the literary marketplace of the mideighteenth century, which have tended to begin with the assumption that, as 1 Lawrence E. Klein, "Gender and the Public/Private Distinction in the Eighteenth Century: Some Questions about Evidence and Analytic Procedure," Eighteenth-Century Studies 29 (1995), 97, 102. EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION, Volume 13, Number 4, July 2001 562 EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY FICTION Kathryn Shevelow has put it, these writers were permitted to enter the public sphere of letters only to reinforce the figure of "the domestic woman, constructed in a relation of difference to men, a difference of kind rather than degree."2 In the example I will focus on here, the brief publishing career of Frances Sheridan has appeared an easy fit within a "private" and "feminized" tradition of the domestic and sentimental. After all, Sheridan is now known primarily for her novel The Memoirs of Miss Sidney Bidulph (1761), dedicated to Samuel Richardson as "the author of Clarissa and sir charles grandison," in tribute to "exemplary Goodness and distinguished Genius ... found united in One Person." Furthermore, Richardson actively encouraged Sheridan as a writer, and appears to have played some role in bringing this novel into print.3 Thus Janet Todd writes of Sheridan as one of the mid-century's "modest muses," fashioning her literary ambitions according to the constraints of a gendered ideology of public and private spheres, creating "not simply writing butfeminine writing." Margaret Anne Doody describes Sheridan as "a not unworthy follower of Richardson," whose probing of Richardson's fictions produces what "are feminine insights, or at least in the eighteenth century could have been expressed only by a female writer ... only by a sensibility with a deep knowledge of the meaning of powerlessness, and of lack of control over fate." Even Jean Coates Cleary's excellent introduction to Sidney Bidulph places the book in the tradition of the "conduct novel—inspired by Richardson, dedicated to him ... published as he was dying," and bearing "the Richardsonian legacy into the second half ofthe eighteenth century."4 If, however, following Klein, one pays closer attention to space— by which I mean the professional communities within which Sheridan moved—and language—the gestures of professional, political, and moral alignment or dissociation that she makes in her novel and in her correspondence—a picture emerges of a woman whose self-identification as a writer included not only domestic and moral, but also public and political ambitions. By particularizing a number of Sheridan's professional 2 Kathryn Shevelow, Women and Print Culture: The Construction of Femininity in the Early Periodical (London: Routledge, 1989), p. 5. 3 For a recent account ofRichardson's encouragement of Sheridan's early fiction-writing efforts, see Jean Coates Cleary's introduction to Memoirs ofMiss Sidney Bidulph (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995), pp. ix-xi. References are to this edition. 4 Janet Todd, The Sign ofAngelika: Women, Writing, and Fiction 1660-1800 (New York: Columbia, 1989), p. 125; Margaret Anne Doody, "Frances Sheridan: Morality and Annihilated Time," Fetter'd or Free: British Women Novelists, 1670-1815, ed. Mary Anne Schofield and Cecilia Macheski (Athens: Ohio University Press, 1986), pp. 327, 343, 356; Cleary, pp. xvi-xvii. FRANCES SHERIDAN'S SIDNEY BIDULPH 563 associations, as well as...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,132
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,262

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0140,003
Communication savante0,0030,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0240,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,202
Écart entre enseignants0,188 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations22
Publié2001
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEighteenth-Century FictionMême sujetLiterature: history, themes, analysisTravaux en français237 207