MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1963606792 · doi:10.1353/can.2006.0041

Manitoba's French-Language Crisis: A Cautionary Tale (review)

2006· article· en· W1963606792 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Michael D. Behiels

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Historical Review · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHatredSupreme courtPoliticsLawHistoryPolitical scienceRhetoricTheologyPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Manitoba's French-Language Crisis: A Cautionary Tale Michael D. Behiels Manitoba's French-Language Crisis: A Cautionary Tale. Raymond M. Hébert. Montreal and Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press, 2005. Pp. 296, illus. $70.00 'May God save the Queen and damn the French!' So proclaimed the daily prayer of one of the many thousands of embittered Manitoban francophobes at the peak of the political crisis over the restoration of the Franco-Manitobans' constitutional language rights, Section 23 of the Manitoba Act, 1870. Despite the outpouring of venomous rhetoric and undiluted hatred, the Franco-Manitoban community, deprived of its constitutional language rights since 1890, stood firm if not always united and emerged victorious. Canada's Supreme Court justices, in their landmark 13 June 1985 Reference re Language Rights under Section 23 of the Manitoba Act decision proclaimed Section 23 rights to be mandatory. The ruling, which required the costly translation of countless thousands of pages of documents, set the stage for a successful negotiated deal – arbitrated by the Supreme Court – between the Manitoba government and the Société franco-manitobaine (SFM). Paradoxically, the deal – which was based on a quid pro quo entailing far less translation in return for a long overdue and very necessary range of statutory, none constitutionally entrenched, French-language ser- vices – resembled in many of its features the SFM's proposal at the very outset of the crisis. A vindictive and destructive anti-francophone hybrid elitist/populist movement quickly coalesced to prevent both the restoration of Section 23 rights and the creation of French-language provincial government services. The movement failed but, in the process, inflicted severe damage on Manitoba's carefully constructed image of a tolerant, welcoming, and just society. One might be pardoned for thinking that in the liberalizing environment of Canadian society in the 1980s the restoration of violated constitutional language rights reinforced with modern services should have been a relatively straightforward task for the NDP Pawley government. [End Page 330] Hébert quickly disabuses his readers of any illusions they might harbour in this regard. This superbly crafted and lucidly analysed narrative study offers two interrelated explanations for the severity of the crisis. The first addresses the status/symbolism model, while the second focuses on the authoritarian political culture of Manitoba's conservative elites. Manitoban prairie society was a very particular subset of the larger Canadian society, thanks to its distinctive history of mixed settlement and regional hardships. From the very outset, the dominant British-Canadian Protestant community from Ontario and the United Kingdom was successful in imposing its melting-pot, Anglo-conformity values, norms, and institutions on the French-Canadian Catholic Métis and Protestant half-breeds, and then, after 1890, on a wide range of European ethno-cultural, linguistic, and religious communities. In the 1970s and 1980s, the Trudeau federal government challenged Manitoba's Anglo-Canadian community's longstanding appropriation of status and symbolism with its bilingualism and multiculturalism programs in the 1970s, both of which were entrenched in the Constitution Act, 1982, along with its foreign, i.e., 'American,' Charter of Rights and Freedoms. These developments set off a veritable political firestorm of prairie protest, populist and elitist. It is Hébert's contention that Manitoba's political class — led by British-Canadian Conservative premiers, Sterling Lyon and Gary Filmon, and a prominent renegade NDPer, Charles Doern, who embraced Anglo conformity — was largely responsible for the unwarranted, fundamentally undemocratic, manufactured crisis that erupted over the Pawley NDP government's proposed 1984–5 amendments to Section 23 of the Manitoba Act, 1870. The authoritarian Lyon, fresh from his humiliating defeat at the hands of Trudeau, followed by his successor, Filmon, deliberately plugged into and whipped up the always present undercurrent of rural, right-wing populism as a means of defeating the NDP government. Both were determined to prevent, at great political and social costs, the designation of Manitoba as an officially bilingual province and the entrenchment of any language services. One might profitably add that their secondary objective was to prevent the implementation of the other Section 23, of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, one that mandated French-language education – classes, schools, and, following...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,854
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,290

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,008
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,002
Communication savante0,0040,002
Science ouverte0,0020,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0040,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0130,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,013
Tête enseignante GPT0,239
Écart entre enseignants0,226 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Historical Review→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→