THAI-CAPRI Process: Tracing Downhole Upgrading of Heavy Oil
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Worldwide conventional oil production is expected to peak in the present decade, and the need to reevaluate the potential of heavy oil resources becomes ever more imperative. Steamflooding is reliable, but it is not very energy efficient. It also has large water requirements and does not significantly upgrade oil. In situ combustion (ISC), properly configured and operated holds considerable promise for both mobilizing and upgrading heavy crude oils with less energy expenditure. The THAI-CAPRI process appears to eliminate many of the pitfalls of conventional ISC and yield substantially upgraded oil. Although extensive documentation on the performance of the process is available, only basic upgrading data have been reported. The present study aims to quantify the extent and nature of oil upgrading during an experimental run that incorporates dry and wet phases over each toe-heel air injection (THAI) and THAI with catalyst (CAPRI) modes. Gas, oil, water and solid residue analyses are used to infer mechanisms of upgrading and to begin to gauge the economic (sweep and recovery) and environmental (gas emissions and produced water quality) impact associated with the eventual field operation of the process. Introduction Easily accessible conventional oil reserves need to be supplemented by other hydrocarbon sources during the transition from the fossil to a hydrogen fuel economy, e.g. Haaland et al. (1). In the near term, heavy oil (< 20oAPI) exploitation can compete with conventional oil if new approaches are applied to facilitate its recovery and moderate its quality detractors and environmental impact. Steamflooding is by far the most commonly applied enhanced oil recovery (EOR) method. This approach, however, is energy intensive with up to 50% BTU equivalent of oil recovered required to generate steam (2). Steamflooding imparts only minor improvements in oil quality and has a significant environmental impact (greenhouse gas emissions and water contamination). Other EOR approaches include in situ combustion (fireflooding), gas injection / solvent extraction and microbial treatment. Of these, in situ combustion (ISC) has the greatest potential for both increasing recovering rates and improving the quality of oil. Although ISC has been applied for decades, difficulties in process control, reservoir unsuitability, operational practices and oil combustion characteristics have led to its near extinction as an EOR method (Sarathi, 1998) (3). In the last decade, conceptual, bench, pilot and commercial scale approaches to improve the ISC recovery method have been promoted: Operating strategies for spot pattern and line drive (4, 5). Employment of various well configurations (6–11). "Pressure cycling" (12 – 15). "Combustion override split - horizontal well" or COSH (16). "Toe-to-Heel Air Injection" (THAI) and catalyst additive (CAPRI) (17–20). Downhole or near wellbore approaches to ISC are summarized by Weissman et al. (21). Low API gravity, high viscosity, high sulfur and metals content and high acidity will substantially reduce the price realized for oil produced by any EOR method. In some regions, the refining capacity for heavy oils is limited. Large heavy oil operations, therefore, have moved upgrading capability to the site of heavy production (e.g., northern Alberta).
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle