MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1964193515 · doi:10.1111/j.1466-822x.2006.00202.x

Embedding food webs in ecological landscapes

2006· article· en· W1964193515 sur OpenAlexaff
Ross M. Thompson

Notice bibliographique

RevueGlobal Ecology and Biogeography · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueIsotope Analysis in Ecology
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésEcologyFood webSubsidyHabitatTrophic levelTrophic cascadeEcotoneBiomass (ecology)MacroecologyGeographyBiologyBiodiversityEconomics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Polis, G.A., Power, M.E. & Huxel, G.R. (eds) (2004) Food webs at the landscape level. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, USA. xviii + 548 pp., figs, tables, line diagrams, halftones, index. Hardback: price $95.00, ISBN 0-226-67325-1. Paperback: price £25.50, $36.00, ISBN 0-226-67327-8. Food webs at the landscape level arose from an initiative by the late Gary Polis to synthesize landscape ecology and food web ecology. Polis’ groundbreaking work on the role of energy subsidies across ecotones forms the basis for several chapters and serves to remind us of the importance of his contributions. These chapters are complemented by a range of quantitative and modelling studies that provide both an overview of previous work and an abundance of unanswered questions to be addressed by the next generation of studies. The book is a significant advance, in that it is the first to acknowledge and illustrate the important role that flows of energy, materials or organisms from one habitat to another have on the structure and dynamics of food webs. Subsidies are shown to stabilize and destabilize food webs, depending on the nature of the subsidy and what components of the food web are subsidized. Influences of subsidies on species’ coexistence are shown through mechanisms such as apparent trophic cascades, where energy subsidies to a predator in an adjacent habitat increase top-down control of grazers and protect vegetation from grazing pressure. Structurally, the book is ordered in four parts. The first describes the fluxes of materials between habitats in a variety of systems and includes excellent contributions in terms of quantitative studies, summaries of methodologies and theoretical advances. The overview is elegant and concise, and would be perfect reading for a graduate student starting out in this area. Schindler and Lubetkin's section on the use of stable isotopes is one of the best I have read, effectively reviewing the field to date and indicating some exciting new directions for the technique. Robert Holt's modelling chapter is another highlight — using simple community models modified to incorporate external inputs of materials from adjacent ecosystems. The second section of the book concentrates on food web dynamics at the land–water ecotone, where the majority of the work on subsidies has taken place. Any one of these chapters as a stand-alone illustration of the importance of cross-system subsidies is an excellent read. Collectively, however, there is little new that emerges with each subsequent chapter. While this is likely to be a book that people ‘dip into’ rather than read cover-to-cover, I found myself searching for new developments by halfway through the section. Nevertheless, the range of studies clearly illustrates the importance of external subsidies to food-web structure in a variety of aquatic habitats. Much more satisfying in terms of contributing new ideas is the third section, which moves up to larger (regional and global) scales. Here the role of migratory species in transferring energy between ecosystems is addressed, and the strong interconnections between arctic and temperate regions (mediated by snow geese) and marine and freshwater systems (mediated by anadromous fish) are explored. Effects of agricultural development on the global distribution of energy constitute an emerging theme from this section, as does the role of barriers to animal movements. These themes are drawn out further in the fourth, synthesis section. Again, each of the syntheses would be an ideal introduction to subfields dealing, respectively, with physical processes, pulsed productivity, sustainable harvest and conservation and global change. The book is conceptually based on the insights that Polis has given us — largely that subsidies can act across ecotones to influence food webs. Unfortunately the book is also limited to that context — there is little or no mention of dispersal and dispersal limitation, processes which obviously influence local food web structure, and which are central to hot topics within community ecology. Perhaps a chapter addressing the consequences of neutral processes or lottery effects on food web structure could have yielded a range of potential directions for future studies. Equally, while some mention is made of metapopulation dynamics in some chapters, there is no exhaustive treatment of the way in which this rich area of landscape ecology can be integrated with food web ecology. The consequences of food webs comprising source and sink populations are potentially fascinating, but are not addressed in the book. While no book can do everything, given the extremely detailed coverage of the role of subsidies, there should really have been space made available for these other landscape-level processes. Gary Polis asked community ecologists to ‘stop looking at their feet’ and move from studying food webs at a local scale to studying them within a landscape context. This book shows how his exhortation is beginning to be realized and illustrates a new appreciation of the true nature of food webs — complex trophic networks that are embedded within a dynamic landscape. Food webs at the landscape level is an important contribution, and provides a sound basis for a broader synthesis of landscape and food-web ecology.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,010
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,034

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,004
Communication savante0,0060,008
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0100,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,003
Tête enseignante GPT0,206
Écart entre enseignants0,202 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations3
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueGlobal Ecology and BiogeographyMême sujetIsotope Analysis in EcologyTravaux en français237 207