Safety and Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin A in Children Undergoing Lower Limb Lengthening and Deformity Correction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
BACKGROUND: Lengthening of the lower limb is a complex procedure in which pain management and complications such as pin-site infections and muscle contractures impact the family and affect the child's quality of life. As a result, the paralytic and antinociceptive actions of neurotoxins may be indicated in managing these complications; however, few studies have explored ways to improve outcomes after lengthenings. The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) in children undergoing lower limb lengthenings and deformity correction. METHODS: Participants with a congenital or acquired deformity of the lower extremity requiring surgery to one limb were randomized to receiving either BTX-A as a single dose of 10 units per kilogram body weight, or an equivalent volume of saline solution. Pain, medication, quality of life, and physical function were assessed at different time-points. Adverse events were recorded in all participants. T test and χ tests were used to compare potential differences across both groups. RESULTS: Mean age of the 125 participants was 12.5 years (range, 5 to 21 y), and lengthenings averaged 4.2 cm. Maximum pain scores on day 1 postoperatively were lower in the BTX-A group (P=0.03) than in the placebo group, and remained significant favoring botox when stratifying by location of lengthening (femur vs. tibia). Clinical benefits for BTX-A were found for 3 quality of life domains at mid-distraction and end-distraction. When stratifying according to location of lengthening, there were significantly fewer pin-site infections in the tibia favoring botox (P=0.03). The amount of adverse events and bone healing indices were no different in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical differences in quality of life, the lower pain on the first postoperative day, and the lower number of pin-site infections in the tibia favoring BTX-A support its use as an adjunctive treatment to the lengthening process. The detailed analyses of pain patterns help inform families on the pain expectations during lower limb lengthenings. The amount of adverse events were no different in both groups, and bone healing rates were similar, indicating that the use of BTX-A in children undergoing limb lengthening and deformity correction is safe. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».