MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W196440229

Room for a view : Teeth

2002· article· en· W196440229 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Lara Hazelton

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEmpathy and Medical Education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineTooth lossDentistryOrthodonticsPsychologyOral health
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

He tells me the dentist pulled his tooth because of the transistor in it. He shows me, pulling back the side of his mouth with one crooked finger: There. He's 20 years old and this is his first admission. It is not clear whether he has schizophrenia or if the street drugs he's been taking have caused his symptoms. He's been in hospital for a week now, presumably off everything illegal, and it's not looking good. I check his mouth as he requests, and sure enough there is a space between two molars. Would any dentist really pull a tooth because a patient said he was receiving messages through it? Perhaps it was pulled because it was rotten, and this is the explanation he's come up with after the fact. The other teeth aren't in the best shape, either. It's not unusual for patients with schizophrenia to lose their teeth. It's hard to remember to brush every day when you're having problems organizing and motivating yourself because of your illness. Dental coverage is also a problem for many people with schizophrenia, and it seems that in such cases dentists often pull teeth rather than embarking on more expensive procedures. On one unit where I worked, patients who knew the system would request to see the dentist before they were discharged. Back the patient would come an hour later with one less tooth. It was like watching leaves fall, the gum gradually becoming bare as a tree branch in winter. The emergency room physician says, “I'm not a dentist.” This is only partly true. In my four weeks as a psychiatry intern I have seen him hand out antibiotics for infected teeth, spray dry sockets and inject lidocaine into the gum of a man begging us to just pull his tooth. Please. But this time he is talking to the mother of a six-year-old boy. Her son is complaining that his tooth hurts, and she wants us to sedate him, take him to the operating room, do something. “He won't go to the dentist,” says his mother. Her eyes plead with us. “He screams when I try to take him. He's impossible to control.” The supervising physician isn't budging on this one, and I can tell he thinks this is a waste of time. After all, we aren't dentists. Down the hall there's a man with chest pain. A child with a broken arm waits in another room. The doctor's voice betrays his impatience. The mother is not much older than I am, but she looks impossibly weary. What is she going to do after they leave? To my partly trained eye, the boy looks as though he might have attention deficit disorder. I watch him as he climbs up on a stool and jumps onto a stretcher, which lurches dangerously. I think of the tooth, hidden away inside his tight little lips. He is stronger than all of us. Even pain isn't enough to get him to surrender, hold still, and let us look. Mr. Smith is dying of lung cancer and has lapsed into a strange delirium. His wife catches me outside the door and tells me he's worse, very confused. The family is always catching the doctors outside the door, not wanting to speak in front of Mr. Smith. He is lying on the bed with his eyes closed. His three grown sons are at his side. He doesn't look appreciably different, except for the slight flatness and lack of focus that are signs of delirium. “How are you today?” I ask. Mr. Smith smiles a distant smile. “Fine, doctor. Better, I think.” One of the sons gives me a look. “Dad,” says another, “tell her about the teeth.” “What about the teeth, Mr. Smith?” “Oh.” Mr. Smith opens his mouth to show me. “There is another set of teeth lying over my own. Do you see them? No, of course you don't. They're made out of glass, that's why. I'm not able to eat anything for fear they will splinter and cut my mouth.” He runs a shaking finger over his teeth. “I can feel them, though.” The eldest son clears his throat. “Dad ...” “They are there, I tell you,” he snaps. Even through the delirium, he exerts his will. Abashed, his son falls silent. I will have to have another look at Mr. Smith's chart to see if there is anything else I can suggest. What would it feel like, I wonder, to have my teeth encased in glass? Would it cause my speech to slur? Would every word carry a danger of breakage? Would I still have the courage to bite and snap at my grown sons, or would I fall silent, resigned to my fate, defeated, toothless? Lara Hazelton Psychiatrist Toronto, Ont.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,473
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,752

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0060,001
Communication savante0,0050,005
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,4730,186

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,019
Tête enseignante GPT0,280
Écart entre enseignants0,261 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2002
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Medical Association JournalMême sujetEmpathy and Medical EducationTravaux en français237 207