MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1964520032 · doi:10.1353/cls.2006.0043

European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance (review)

2006· article· en· W1964520032 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueComparative Literature Studies · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueRenaissance Literature and Culture
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThe RenaissanceClassicsLiteratureHistoryArtArt history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance Barbara Simerka (bio) European Literary Careers: The Author from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Edited by Patrick Cheney and Frederick A. de Armas. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002. x + 366 pp. $65.00. Patrick Cheney and Frederick de Armas have created an anthology which seeks to create the theoretical approach that it practices, "career criticism." They ground this endeavor in studies by Lawrence Lipking (1981), Richard Helgerson (1983), and Leo Braudy (1986) which analyze authors from Virgil to Rilke whose writings express a "self-conscious sense of vocation or destiny" and foreground the "process of self-presentation" as a poet laureate (5). Over the past twenty years, scholars of European literature have used the career studies paradigm primarily for analysis of Spenser's oeuvre; the contributors to this volume greatly expand the field of study as they trace modalities of careerism from Classical authors to the seventeenth century. The introduction also cites Louis Montrose's musings on career criticism as a form of a post-Foucauldian study of authorship: not a return to intentionality studies, but a historically and culturally grounded analysis of the "author function" (21). The anthology presents its studies in chronological order, beginning with Joseph Farrell's exploration of Greek and Roman careerism. Farrell delineates an Athenian model in which writers practiced a single genre and presented themselves as experts in and defenders of that particular kind, and the shift to the Virgilian "triad" model of authors who "evolve" from eclogues through georigics to the epic pinnacle. This sequence formalizes the notion of generic hierarchy, in which the epic reigns over lesser genres, and thus is the crowning achievement of the mature poet. Farrell also explores the emergence of the poet laureate as a public citizen whose career path is similar to and as important to the Republic as that of the senator or consul. This opening study establishes clear connections between specific socio-political circumstances and the public function of the career author which are echoed in many of the later essays. The next three essays demonstrate that the Virgilian triad is not the sole model for authors who consciously craft a public persona. Mark Vessey elucidates the development of an alternate, Christian careerism, first outlined by Braudy in his analysis of Augustine's Confessions and other spiritual writings. This early Christian cursus, just as self-aware as the pagan path, [End Page 191] emphasizes the conversion narrative and the autobiography of spiritual development, as well as emphasis upon the poet as the humble recipient of divine illumination. In studying Jerome's vast output, Vessey also identifies the bibliography of previous Christian writers as an important element, creating an alternative history of forefathers. This is a tactic that scholars have also noted among women and other writers from marginalized groups who seek to legitimate their claims to authority. Vessey also explores the actual process of writing, as commemorated in visual representation: from late antiquity through the fourteenth century, authors are depicted with completed works at hand, for composition was conceived of as a process in which the author, inspired by pagan muse or Christian deity, dictated his words to a scribe. Vessey does not indicate any sort of cultural anxiety concerning the separation of authorizing voice and inscribing hand; further scrutiny of this model of writing could enhance the current recuperation of texts dictated by illiterate mystical authors to their confessors in the early modern period. Robert B. Edwards stretches the notion of career criticism to its limits in his analysis of Chaucer, Lydgate, and Boccaccio. Edwards characterizes their Theban texts as far more indirect, ignoring the model of self-conscious and self-advertised progression through genres. Instead, Edwards asserts, they employ "invention" in order to reinscribe classical sources as well as each other's texts. This essay dances at the boundaries of career criticism, revealing its intersection with the study of intertextuality. James Burke provides a more comprehensive and nuanced analysis of the dynamics of indirect careerism in his study of medieval Spanish authors. He identifies the "invention" model and also the Christian trope of authorial humility as forms of patriarchy that impede...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,931
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,083
Tête enseignante GPT0,320
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle