Marconi in the Sculpture of John McEwen: Essays by John McEwen, Ann Pollock, and Mary Reid (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Marconi in the Sculpture of John McEwen: Essays by John McEwen, Ann Pollock, and Mary Reid Karen Mulhallen (bio) [Mary Reid, editor.] Marconi in the Sculpture of John McEwen: Essays by John McEwen, Ann Pollock, and Mary Reid. Winnipeg Art Gallery. 2007. 96. $39.99 Marconi in the Sculpture of John McEwen is an exhibition catalogue tracing forty years of a major sculptor's work, beginning with a steel dog, [End Page 462] 2.5 inches thick, sitting beside a dog chain and collar. The chain ends in a ring that is free to slide the length of a flexible steel cable. Marconi sits motionless, looking somewhere past the items that formerly constrained him. The dog is both subject and object. As a sculpture the dog remains mute and motionless, but as a subject it looks where animals look. This early sculpture (1977-78), this minimalist investigation, was a work stripped to its barest narrative elements, catching the central contradiction of art. The animal that is represented is both there and not there. The life of the world is independent of the projections of the human psyche. Over four decades, McEwen has exhibited his work nationally and internationally, alternating his art practice between public commissions and solo exhibitions. His public commissions include the Royal Canadian Air Force Hall of Tribute in the National Aviation Museum in Ottawa (1984), with its Herculean casting of a bronze floor mirroring the topography of the globe, and a twenty-foot engraved soaring cast bronze canoe, River as Thread, the Canoe as Needle, in the open passage of the new Canadian Embassy in Berlin (2005). In his notes to a recent exhibition in Halifax, 'Ocean Mind / Ocean Stories' (2009), McEwen described himself as 'a thinker with things and in particular things in the form of animals. Often life-size, often canine, these animals are usually flame-cut from solid steel plate.' And it is certainly true that the animal has been one of the dominant forms in his lexicon. However, his more recent work has been expanding his vocabulary into the world of heavenly space and into the world of the sea. He began with stars as ideograms in 1991 and has continued with them as building blocks, constructing star vessels, urns, submarines, and even scuba diving tanks. McEwen's work is focused on the semi-permeable membrane that separates contraries, material and immaterial, real and chimerical, present and absent. It is built form as ideas, itself embodying the contradictions that lie at the heart of human life. As craft, over the decades, his paradoxical work, defying its own weight, has grown in delicacy of execution and meditative power, taking us deeper and deeper with each installation into the politics, dreams, and fears of our own times. The current catalogue is itself a paradox: masquerading as an accompaniment to a site specific exhibition, it is in fact a catalogue raisonne´ but one that deconstructs the usual protocols, the conventional chronologies. Works from different periods are placed in juxtaposition to one another and sometimes recapitulated. Older works are shot through new lenses, colour interacts with black-and-white photography, quotations from literary, philosophical, and ecological texts with narration by the artist and commentary by critics. Each of the three catalogue essays deals with the philosophical and material propositions put forward in McEwen's work. They do overlap [End Page 463] but each seems essential to an understanding of this enormous and compelling body of work. As curator, Mary Reid focuses on the exhumation and restoration of the pivotal artifact, Marconi. She situates the placing of the work for the exhibit and suggests some future considerations. Anne Pollock, who first worked with McEwen at the Vancouver Art Gallery in a group show in 1979, considers the work in the trajectory of the artist's career. Her references to Bruce Chatwin's Songlines are particularly apt, as Chatwin, like McEwen, insists on the importance of staying connected with ancient patterns of behaviour and thought. The final essay, by the artist himself, 'Notes towards a Working Minimalism,' ties together in an open-ended meditation the preceding essays, the photographs of the works and installations, and the reconfigurations...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,009 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,014 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».