159 TECHNIQUES FOR OVUM PICK-UP IN GONADOTROPIN-TREATED ALPACAS
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The objective of the present study was to evaluate the quantity and quality of oocytes collected when using 2 methods for ovum pick-up and 2 different regimens for ovarian stimulation in live alpaca donors. Thirty-four non-pregnant female alpacas of 3 to 5 years of age maintained at 4100 m elevation in southern Peru were randomly distributed into 4 experimental groups. Groups 1 ( n = 8) and 3 ( n = 9) received an intravaginal device containing 0.78 mg of progesterone (Cue-Mate®, Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) plus an i.m. injection of 1 mg of estradiol benzoate on Day 0; the intravaginal device was removed on Day 7. Groups 2 ( n = 7) and 4 ( n = 10) received an i.m. injection of 3.1 mg of LH (Lutropin®, Bioniche Animal Health) on Day 0. Females received 700 IU of eCG (Pregnecol®, Bioniche Animal Health) i.m. on Day 7 (Groups 1 and 3) or Day 2 (Groups 2 and 4). In all groups, oocyte collection was done 2 days after the injection of eCG. Groups 1 and 2 were subjected to ventral laparotomy aspirating the oocytes from follicles >3 mm in diameter using a 10-mL hypodermic syringe containing 1 mL of aspiration media (Ringer's lactate solution plus 10% bovine serum) and connected to an 18 G × 1 inch aspiration needle. After collection, the follicular fluid was searched and the COC were graded. Groups 3 and 4 were subjected to ovum pick-up by transvaginal recovery using an ultrasound scanner (Parus 240®, Pie Medical, Maastricht, the Netherlands) equipped with a vaginal probe of 7.5 MHz (MEVA®, Pie Medical) and a 17G × 55 cm aspiration needle introduced through a needle guide. Follicles >3 mm in diameter were aspirated into 50-mL centrifuge tubes containing 5 mL of aspiration media with 75 IU mL–1 of heparin. The aspirated fluid was filtered and rinsed using an embryo filter (EmCon®, Immunosystems, Menomonie, WI), and COC were searched and graded under a microscope based on the intactness of the cumulus cell layers. Data were analyzed by ANOVA. There were no differences ( P > 0.05) between groups in the mean number of follicles aspirated per donor (11.0, 13.8, 9.4, and 9.1 for Groups 1 to 4 respectively), and in the mean number of COC recovered per donor (7.6, 7.0, 6.0, and 6.1 respectively for Groups 1 to 4). The proportions of good quality COC were significantly ( P < 0.01) different between surgical (81.0 and 79.5% for Groups 1 and 2) and transvaginal/ultrasound-guided (7.4% for Group 3) methods of collection; however, they were similar to the proportion in Group 4 (64.9%) retrievals. The results show that in the absence of an intravaginal device, a similar quantity and quality of alpaca oocytes can be collected when using a surgical approach or minimally invasive ultrasound-guided transvaginal follicular aspiration.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle