MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1965267144 · doi:10.1890/1540-9295-8.7.392

Let's pray for the lamprey

2010· review· en· W1965267144 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Adrian Burton

Notice bibliographique

RevueFrontiers in Ecology and the Environment · 2010
Typereview
Langueen
DomaineEnvironmental Science
ThématiqueFish Ecology and Management Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLampreyPetromyzonSpawn (biology)NOMINATEFisheryFishingFish migrationGeographyFish <Actinopterygii>Biology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Every year, in May, I migrate northward from Spain, where I live, to spend a week fly fishing for brown trout on the River Usk in Wales, UK. This beautiful river, which has long been the haunt of trout and salmon men, is also visited in May by the rare Twaite and Allis shads, tarpon-like fish that spawn in spectacular frenzy where the river passes through the little town from which it takes its name. If they are lucky, the townspeople may also catch sight of another spawning visitor from the sea – one that in a lifetime of walking river banks I had longed, but never managed, to see: the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Now, having finally knelt by their riverbed nests and watched their efforts to continue their kind, I am moved to nominate lampreys, these most ancient of vertebrates, as a new flagship conservation species on which to focus attention in a world in the throes of a mass extinction. They are unlikely candidates, I know, but their qualifications are good. Across Europe, populations of various lamprey species have suffered serious decline. In his book My Life, Usk's most illustrious citizen, Alfred Russel Wallace, remembers the river's once great abundance of lampreys. Recalling some stone slabs in the river near his childhood home in the Usk hamlet of Llanbadoc, he writes, “...and it was these that formed our favourite fishing stations, where we sometimes found shoals of small lampreys which could be scooped up in basins or old saucepans, and which were then fried for our dinner or supper, to our great enjoyment. I think what we caught must have been the young fish, as my recollection of them is that they were like little eels and not more than six or eight inches long...my recollections must go back to the time when I was just over three”. Wallace was three years old in 1826. I have fished for hours in front of the cottage where he was born, but those lamprey shoals, like the stone slabs, have become a thing of the past. Academic work confirms the losses. Investigations in Germany and Poland, for instance, record dramatic declines in lamprey numbers between 1887 and 1999. “River lamprey [Lampetra fluviatilis] numbers are in critical condition in the German Baltic region”, according to Curator of Ichthyology Ralf Thiel (Biocenter Grindel and Zoological Museum, University of Hamburg, Germany). “Currently, no sea lamprey reproduction site in the area is known. We need to restore habitat where river lampreys still spawn and remove barriers to their movement, to give them more of a chance. This might help sea lampreys too.” In the Great Lakes of North America, however, P marinus is an invasive pest. Accidentally introduced in the late 19th and early 20th centuries via shipping canals, the species' abundance soared as its members fed on lake trout, requiring massive control efforts. These have included the spraying of lampricides, the use of pheromone attractants, and even the sterilization of male lampreys later released to compete for females with “intact” males. “The US and Canada spend millions each year trying to control the numbers of Atlantic sea lampreys in the Great Lakes streams, where they should not be”, explains Professor of Zoology Jim Kitchell (University of Wisconsin, Madison). “But that does not make it any less of a threatened species elsewhere.” It is this very counterpoint that could keep lampreys in the public mind, drawing attention to the plight of European species, as well as threatened North American species such as the Pacific or mountain brook lamprey. No one seems to be indifferent to lampreys. Notable enthusiasts have included England's King Henry I (1068–1135, who died of “a surfeit” of them), and the inhabitants of the village of Arno in northwestern Spain. Each year, on the last Sunday in April, the villagers celebrate the sea lamprey festival, in which the relatively large numbers that still enter the River Miño become a gastronomic attraction. Cooked in their own blood and served with rice, they are regarded as a great delicacy. The Portuguese, French, and Finnish are no less keen, and, in the UK, the people of Gloucester still present British monarchs with lamprey pie on special occasions. In contrast, many game fishermen are notable detractors of lampreys, and not just because the latter feed parasitically on fish stocks. No, even in Usk, fishermen whose fly lines have seen many a season will tell you with a shudder how lampreys, with those horrible suckers, have swum between their legs. I have now seen sea lampreys in the wild, and I confess to being a lamprey lover. I hope my sons will one day take up a fly rod with me and try to delicately land a dry fly on the water in front of Wallace's cottage, but equally I hope they will never be in the shameful position of having to tell their own children that Grandad once saw some of these wonderful creatures before they all disappeared.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,027
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,090

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0050,005
Communication savante0,0050,006
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,016
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0270,026

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,009
Tête enseignante GPT0,222
Écart entre enseignants0,212 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueFrontiers in Ecology and the EnvironmentMême sujetFish Ecology and Management StudiesTravaux en français237 207