MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1965535285 · doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2012-302920ag.3

MICRORNA-10A CAN RESTORE HUMAN MESENCHYMAL STEM CELL DIFFERENTIATION THROUGH KLF4

2012· article· en· W1965535285 sur OpenAlexaff
Jiao Li, Jun Dong, Shuhong Li, Dong-Cheng Zhang, Xiangyu You, Yun Zhong, Minsheng Chen, Shiming Liu

Notice bibliographique

RevueHeart · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueMicroRNA in disease regulation
Établissements canadiensUniversity Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMesenchymal stem cellKLF4microRNACellular differentiationStem cellCell biologyMedicineBiologyRegeneration (biology)Bone marrowCancer researchPathologyImmunologyEmbryonic stem cellInduced pluripotent stem cellGeneticsGene

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Objectives Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSC) are thought to be multipotent cells, which have the properties of self-regeneration and differentiation plasticity, that can replicate and differentiate into lineages of mesenchymal tissues, including bone, fat, cartilage, tendon, muscle and marrow stroma. Human aging is a highly complex process that is characterised by an increase in age-associated diseases. Some studies have found that aging affects MSC function. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are posttranscriptional modulators of gene expression that are small, non-coding (typically 20 nt) and incorporate into the miRNA-induced silencing complex (RISC) to play an important role in many developmental processes. In a variety of cellular processes, such as cell survival, replicative senescence, proliferation and differentiation, miRNAs are key regulators. MiRNAs expression patterns change with age, and miRNA may directly affect the aging process. Recent studies have suggested that miRNAs change during MSC differentiation and that miRNAs play a critical role in MSC differentiation. At present, few data exist to confirm the role of aging-related miRNAs in hMSC differentiation. This study profiled the miRNA expression of hMSC derived from young and old individuals and directly assessed the effects of these miRNAs during hMSC differentiation. Methods Human bone marrow aspirates were obtained from the sternums of patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Young bone marrow was collected from patients aged 17–30, and old bone marrow was obtained mainly from patients aged 65–80 with valve disease. HMSC was immunostained with fluorescein conjugated antibodies to identify hMSC. Cell growth was evaluated using the cell proliferation assay for 7 consecutive days after plating. Growth curves were generated for young and old hMSC and compared. HMSC was induced to three lineage differentiation (include of adipogenic, osteogenic and chondrogenic differentiation) by culturing in the differentiation medium. Immunohistochemistry stain and real time PCR were used to identify the differentiated cell and cell specific gene expression of adipocyte, osteoblast and chondroblast. The hMSC senescence was analysed by the β-galactosidase staining. The miRNAs expression in young and old hMSC was analysed by Affymetrix GeneChip 2.0 miRNA arrays and identified by real time PCR. Dual-luciferase gene report system was used to identify the target of miR-10a. miR-10a lentiviral constructs for over-expressing miR-10a, inhibiting the expression of miR-10a and KLF4 were used to detect the effect of miR-10a and KLF4 in hMSC proliferation, differentiation and cell senescence. Results Compared with the young hMSC, the proliferate and differentiate potential of old hMSC were decreased. In old hMSC, both the percentage of SA-β-gal positive cells and the staining intensity increased. Although aged hMSC became senescent, the composition and expression level of MSC specific surface markers were not varied. Hsa-miR-196a, hsa-miR-378, hsa-miR-378-star, hsa-miR-486-5p and hsa-miR-664-star were up-regulated and that hsa-miR-10a, hsa-miR-708 and hsa-miR-3197 were down-regulated in old subjects compared with young subjects. KLF4, identified by dual-luciferase gene report system, was the target of miR-10a. Over-expression of miR-10a can increase the differentiation of all three cell lineages in old and young hMSC and reduce cell senescence; conversely, proliferation was inhibited. Contrastingly, inhibiting miR-10a expression produced the opposite result. Directly suppressing KLF4 expression resulted in differentiation, reduced cell senescence and inhibit proliferation in both young and old hMSC. Conclusions 1. In old hMSC, accompany with the age increased, the composition and expression level of MSC specific surface markers were not varied; the proliferate and three lineage differentiate potential were decreased; the cell senescence increased; miRNA expression was varied. 2. MicroRNA-10a can restore human mesenchymal stem cell differentiation through KLF4.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,183
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,550

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,018
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,246 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueHeartMême sujetMicroRNA in disease regulationTravaux en français237 207