MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1965855959 · doi:10.3821/145.2.cpj96

A Student's Reflection on the Co-Op Experience

2012· article· en· W1965855959 sur OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Justin Shea

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiquePharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Waterloo
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésInternshipPharmacyCurriculumMedical educationPharmacistPsychologyQuality (philosophy)PedagogyMedicineNursing

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The University of Waterloo's innovative pharmacy co-op program is designed to give students the opportunity to learn on the job and to apply their academic skills to the real world. It differs from summer jobs in that preceptors are required to teach students in more depth and show students the roles of pharmacists in a variety of environments, including community, hospital, governmental and research sectors. It is distinct from internships because students are able to experiment and determine which practice settings they might like to enter in their future careers. As a strict requirement in Waterloo's pharmacy curriculum, the co-op program has, to some degree, helped compensate for the summer job losses students have experienced over the past few years. It was during the pursuit of my first co-op placement that the provincial governments began to ban the professional allowances paid to pharmacies. Since our first-year class was competing with third-year students for job placements, many pharmacies opted for the more experienced students to fill the few positions they had available. Yet, because Waterloo believes it is imperative for pharmacy students to gain on-the-job experience, the university enlisted co-op advisors to help their co-op coordinator find work for all the students. These advisors worked day and night searching for potential jobs all over the country and managed to find a placement for every student by the end of the term. Waterloo's dedication to the pursuit of quality pharmacist mentoring is inspiring. Although I had only completed my first year in pharmacy at the time, I believed I had already gained many skills and much knowledge through my work experience in the community setting these past months. To me, this experience has been at least as valuable as the lessons I've learned through my academic studies. For instance, pharmacists have taught me about different pharmacy settings and how difficult it may be to shift from one to another, depending on your experience. Both community and hospital practice have their merits and I would be happy working in either, but I wouldn't be aware of the differences if I hadn't received this information from an experienced pharmacist. My co-op experience in community pharmacy has taught me that pharmacists must be able to stay calm under pressure and work quickly and efficiently. My first shift was on an extremely busy night. At one point, I looked at my preceptor and noticed that he was cool and collected despite all the chaos around him. He radiated an aura of calm that helped me and the technician relax; he even managed to soothe some of the frustrated patients. The technician — a former nurse with 30 years of experience — was extremely competent and had the patience to teach me even though she was busily performing multiple tasks. Communication is another key aspect of being a pharmacist, and the co-op work experience has contributed to my understanding of its importance in everyday practice. A pharmacist needs to know what kind of information and language is suitable for patients, physicians and fellow pharmacists. In the community pharmacy setting, I have improved my ability to listen to patients, as well as gather clues from their body language and unspoken meanings. I have learned several communication tips to use when dealing with difficult patients; the most important lesson, in my opinion, being “it's not what you say; it's how you say it.” Telling the patient that you “can't” or “won't” be able to help him will arouse aggravation, whereas telling him “we'll work on this” or “I'll have it done by this other time” can help calm him, while still communicating the message. The work program has also allowed me to hone my academic knowledge in a practice setting and experience first-hand the effects of this knowledge on patient health. One pharmacist I work with regularly assigns me side projects intended to demonstrate patient-focused care. This includes situations requiring in-depth research on the patient's behalf. On one particular occasion, one of our diabetic patients was planning a trip to a tropical destination where he would not have access to a fridge for his insulin for at least a week. After completing my research, I found that insulin stored at 37oC did not significantly differ in blood glucose–lowering performance compared to insulin stored at 5°C.1 Regardless, the temperature at which insulin is stored should be kept as low as possible and I suggested that the patient store the insulin in a lunch bag that had a reflective coating on the inside and maintain a lower temperature using instant ice packs (so that the environment for the insulin would be kept cold when he needed it to be). Not only was the patient extremely thankful on the phone, he visited the pharmacy a few days later for the sole purpose of thanking me for my work. This particular project taught me something new about insulin's shelf-life and how to serve patients on a more direct level. In addition to the skills I am developing through the co-op program, I have been given the opportunity to work with excellent pharmacists. One of them has won the Canadian pharmacist of the year award, mainly due to his MacGyver-like ideas and fierce intellect. I have learned a lot from him and his constant medication quizzes, such as what to do in certain situations and how to deal with tough cases. Without him, I would not know that we can request that doctors give samples of rosuvastatin to patients who do not possess sufficient funds or a drug plan or how pharmacists can act as a patient advocate, assisting with arranging coverage of expensive drugs. Pharmacists like him earn patient appreciation and improve patient quality of life through their deep reservoirs of knowledge and compassion. It is because of these mentors that I am compelled to learn as much as possible for the sake of my current and future patients. The future of pharmacy is dependent on the competence of the next generations of pharmacists. Though co-op programs are not the only means of improving the quality of practice of future pharmacists, they are a major step in the right direction, providing pharmacy students with a better understanding of the pharmacy world.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,027

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0170,008
Communication savante0,0120,008
Science ouverte0,0030,012
Intégrité de la recherche0,0080,019
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,227
Tête enseignante GPT0,435
Écart entre enseignants0,208 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2012
Routes d'admission3
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada→Même sujetPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes→Travaux en français237 207→