Cross Culture and Faith: The Life and Work of James Mellon Menzies (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Cross Culture and Faith: The Life and Work of James Mellon Menzies David Curtis Wright Linfu Dong . Cross Culture and Faith: The Life and Work of James Mellon Menzies. University of Toronto Press 2005. viii, 329. $65.00 This is a painstakingly, lovingly executed biography of James Mellon Menzies (1885–1957), a gifted and intense Canadian missionary and accomplished scholar whose religious imagination was inspired by a singular conviction: that God had personally led him to the Ruins of Yin in China and willed him to study and collect the 'oracle bones' found there, or the mysterious engraved and cracked bones (mostly the shoulder blades of cattle or tortoise shells) used during Shang times (ca. 1600–1056 BCE) as part of a divinatory cult for communicating with the supernatural realm. On the oracle bones were engraved some of the most ancient Chinese writing in existence. [End Page 332] Menzies was convinced that the deity Shangdi named on many of the carefully preserved and buried Shang oracle bones could, at least conceptually, be equated with the one true God. For him this was tremendously exciting because it meant that Christianity could be indigenized in China. If the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob could be shown from the most ancient of Chinese documents to be the God of the Chinese as well, he reasoned, then skeptics such as Hu Shi and Feng Youlan, who argued that the Chinese historically have been a philosophical rather than a religious people, would be proven wrong and the cause of the Christian gospel in China would be greatly advanced, although neither Menzies nor his modern Chinese biographer ever bothered to elaborate much on the specific particulars of exactly how and why this would happen. The first hundred pages cover Menzies' youth in rural Ontario, his Christian faith, his arrival in China in 1910 on the eve of the revolution that overthrew China's last dynasty, Qing (1644–1912), and an interim period of military service in France from 1917 to 1920 with a group of non-combatant Chinese labourers sent to Europe to aid the Allied cause during and after the First World War. China's revolutions, upheavals, and wars rumble in the background (and sometimes the foreground) of Menzies' life in China, but not until page 109 do we get to the meat, or rather the bones, of the book. The announcement that Menzies had collected 50, 000 oracle-bone fragments by 1927 comes suddenly, like a bolt out of the blue, and so does the account of how he felt God had led him to the Ruins of Yin in 1914 and his publication of a book on the oracle bones in 1917. Where did Menzies' ideas about the oracle bones come from? As Dong indicates at least twice, the equation of Shangdi with God was not original to Menzies; Jesuits in China during the seventeenth century also made the connection. So did Menzies ever credit them? It is quite unlikely that Menzies would have been unaware of the Jesuits' speculations on the Shangdi question, so his seeming silence is baffling. Of course, it would be unreasonable to fault Dong for not answering this question if Menzies was indeed silent on it, but Dong's failure even to consider it is a bit surprising. Additionally, scholarship by David Mungello and others shows that during the seventeenth century there were robust discussions and debates between Jesuits and Chinese scholar-officials about the appropriateness of the Shangdi/God equation. Menzies' style seems, in fact, Jesuitical in some ways, given his intense dedication, fine scholarship in the service of faith, and belief that Christianity could and should accommodate itself culturally to the Chinese scene. Menzies is known to Shang specialists as a competent scholar, but Dong's book is very worthwhile because of its sensitivity, insight, and [End Page 333] reminder to us that Menzies was a convinced Christian. His Christian faith informed and coloured all aspects of his life, including his three career roles as collector for the Chinese people (as opposed to collecting for himself and his own profit), archaeologist, and (above all) evangelical theorist who believed firmly that Christianity could and...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,003 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».