MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W1966405502 · doi:10.1353/ctr.2011.0075

The Experience of Imaginary Ordinary

2011· article· en· W1966405502 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Andrew Houston

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Theatre Review · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCultural Industries and Urban Development
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThe ImaginarySociologyArtMedia studiesArt historyVisual artsAestheticsPsychologyPsychoanalysis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Experience of Imaginary Ordinary Andrew Houston (bio) Imaginary Ordinary: A Community Mapping Project created by interdisciplinary artists Eric Moschopedis and Laura Leif (with Mia Rushton) . Participants: residents of Crescent Heights, Regal Terrace, and Renfrew, Calgary, AB. 8 May to 29 August 2009. Imaginary Ordinary. Peter Mark Keays and Eric Moschopedis , eds. Calgary: Eric Moschopedis, 2010. Photographs by Bryce Krysnki, Mia Ruston, Eric Moschopedis, Laura Leif, Aviva Zimmerman . www.birdwatcher-yyc.ca. "Too much art 'about place,' is more about art and the place of art than about the actual places where artists and viewers find themselves." —Lucy Lippard, The Lure of the Local: Sense of Place in a Multicentred Society Many artistic directors of theatre companies across Canada think carefully about how their programming will reach out to a local community. Cognizant of good dramaturgical practice, aware of the latest business models, and no doubt having a solid understanding of their company's constituency, its demographic, and its niche, these competent people will then go about programming a season of productions. Often the content of these plays will resonate deeply with the artistic director's sense of who its audience is, or could be. The company will then market the season and will frequently use the word "community" to describe the "experience" of belonging a person might have if she or he was to attend these productions, preferably the entire season—at a discount price, of course—as these plays will address issues and/or identities and/or themes that this particular audience member will care about. I think we've all gone through this before, haven't we? No doubt the readers of CTR have been on both sides of these campaigns, having been both producers and consumers of these seasons. For the past several decades the formula has been remarkably similar, whether we're [End Page 94] talking about a theatre company in Halifax, Montreal, Toronto, Winnipeg, Regina, Edmonton, Vancouver, or wherever. Click for larger view View full resolution "Tyler still loves Pokemon, even though his friends don't." Project photos by Bryce Krysnki, Mia Rushton, Eric Moschopedis, Laura Leif, and Aviva Zimmerman It seems to me that this strategy is mistaken in two respects: first, community isn't something that can be generated through marketing or other superficial ways that producers use to generate attention to artistic products; second, community is surely something much more multifaceted, layered, and complex than the feeling of unity that can sometimes occur between people attending a company's fundraising event or by being an audience of a performance. This is why Imaginary Ordinary is such an important book: it's an innovative documentation in the style of a curatorial catalogue of the event, Imaginary Ordinary, a community-mapping project that took place in the Calgary neighbourhoods of Crescent Heights, Regal Terrace, and Renfrew during the summer of 2009. Eric Moschopedis and Laura Leif, the artistic leaders of this event, facilitated a form of engagement with their neighbours that has many important lessons for theatre practitioners whose websites, mission statements, and season announcements would suggest are trying to do the same thing, but less effectively. Before I review the book, here is an outline of the event upon which the book is based. On 8 May 2009, after weeks of preparing the space (from fixing the roof to re-wiring and re-flooring), an abandoned storefront that constituted the home base of Imaginary Ordinary was opened. The storefront's location, on Centre Street, just north of Calgary's downtown core, made it an ideal space of operation to serve the surrounding neighbourhoods. The book describes the space as having a fun and funky décor where people could meet, socialize, and participate in various scheduled activities. Wall space was devoted to the display of various projects; there was a collection of comfortable chairs and a large table for gatherings, and even a modest kitchen space so tea and other refreshments could be served. From its opening until 29 August 2009, when it closed, the space was gradually transformed by the tangible outcomes of the project. Yet while the space filled up with interesting and engaging artwork, Moschopedis contends that the storefront...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,979
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,062

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,006
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0290,037
Communication savante0,0120,012
Science ouverte0,0020,024
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0180,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,069
Tête enseignante GPT0,298
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueCanadian Theatre Review→Même sujetCultural Industries and Urban Development→Travaux en français237 207→