Sounding Eyes: Mina Loy’s Acoustic Subjectivity in “The Song of the Nightingale is Like the Scent of Syringa”
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Sounding Eyes: Mina Loy’s Acoustic Subjectivity in “The Song of the Nightingale is Like the Scent of Syringa” Suzanne Zelazo (bio) During a 1965 taped interview with poets Paul Blackburn and Robert Vas Dias, the avant-garde artist Mina Loy admitted to a fascination with the sonic complexity of language. About the making of her poems, Loy confessed: “I’d only written these things for the sake of the sounds” (Shreiber and Tuma 214).1 Uttered one year before her death, Loy’s admission is among the last recorded words we have of the poet, and her remark underscores a certain dismissive posturing consistent with her self-fashioning as artist figure. Her statement nonetheless draws attention to the relationship between the materiality of language and the sensorial, betraying the extent to which her training in multiple artistic media informed her use and understanding of the extralexical aspects of the word. Primarily recognized as a poet and painter, Mina Loy was also a designer, model, actor, and inventor. She was never content to work exclusively within the bounds of one discipline and thus cultivated an artistic [End Page 77] methodology that deliberately intersected various media. Understanding her distinct penchant for multidisciplinarity not only helps to elucidate her integrationist tendency and preoccupation with liminality but also provides multidiscursive clues to the complexity of her sonic experimentation. In fact, Loy’s definition of poetry in her 1925 essay “Modern Poetry,” prioritizes sound: “Poetry is prose bewitched, a music made of visual thoughts, the sound of an idea” (Lost Lunar 157). Throughout her essay, which compares American poetry to jazz, Loy maintains that it is the acoustics of a “composite” and “living” American language “enriched and variegated with the grammatical structure and voice-inflection of many races” that is the driving force of rhythm in modern poetry (158–59). Sound, for Loy, demonstrates the interplay between semantic and non-semantic signification that characterizes communication. Loy’s precise and condensed vocabulary and syntax force the reader back to the surface of the text—to a “close listening” of its materiality. Indeed, Charles Bernstein’s introduction to Close Listening: Poetry and the Performed Word provides a very useful framework for “hearing” Loy’s sonic theorization and experimentation. Bernstein argues: It is precisely because sound is an arational or nonlogical feature of language that it is so significant for poetry—for sound registers the physicality of language, a physicality that must be the grounding of reason exactly insofar as it eludes rationality. Sound is language’s flesh, its opacity as meaning marks its material embeddedness in the world of things. Sound brings writing back from its metaphysical and symbolic function to where it is at home, in performance. (21) Similarly, Loy’s lesser-known poem, “The Song of the Nightingale is Like the Scent of Syringa” (1958), is a vivid example of her preoccupation with the productive tensions that are generated by a textual or poetic instantiation of the sonic qualities of language. The poem is a kaleidoscope of sounds and puns, and it reveals specifically how those sounds command the space of the page in a playful and complex jouissance. Reprinted in full below, the poem was first published in Jonathan Williams’s 1958 edition of Loy’s poems, Lunar Baedecker & Time Tables. Not surprisingly, it benefits from being read aloud: [End Page 78] The Song of the Nightingale is Like the Scent of Syringa2 Nightingale singing—gale of Nanking Sing—mystery of Ming-dynasty sing ing in Ming Syringa Myringa Singer Song-winged sing-wing syringa ringer Song-wing sing long syringa lingerer (80) Loy’s poem relies primarily on phonetic shifts that articulate both the “arational” and rational features of the poet’s linguistic choices. The first line of the poem invites the reader into an emotive and sensory appreciation of language, recombining “Nightingale singing” into “gale of Nanking.” Linguistically and imagistically, the first phrase is reversed in the subsequent one wherein “gale,” which denotes an emotional outburst and a strong current of air, becomes the metaphorical song of Nanking. The one-time capital of China, Nanking was invaded by Japan in 1937 and became the site of a genocide: an estimated...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».