Timing of thoracic irradiation in limited stage small-cell lung cancer: is it still a star on the rise?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Early cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is a mainstay treatment in limited stage small-cell lung cancer (LS SCLC; the Union for International Cancer Control stage I-III). This is based on the several randomized trials and meta-analyses. Most considerable of them are the National Cancer Institute of Canada (NCIC), Intergroup-0096, and the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG)-9104 trials [1-3]. These studies included pre-chemotherapy extent of the tumor in radiation portals and demonstrated 5-year survival rates over 20%. Importantly, starting point and application of thoracic irradiation (TRT) in these trials was different. In NCIC study mild hypofractionated TRT was applied with the second cycle whereas in the INT-0096 and JCOG-9104 (concurrent arm) trials accelerated hyperfractionated radiotherapy was started with the first cycle of chemotherapy. In all these trials TRT began within 30 days after initiation of chemotherapy, treatment time of TRT was less than 30 days and dose delivery of chemotherapy and TRT was more than 80%. Another substantial aspect was that deferred application of TRT in the late arms of NCIC and JCOG-9104 trials resulted in the increase of CRT duration as a whole treatment. A retrospective study has reported that in LS SCLC duration of CRT, itself, can also affect overall survival. Recently published randomized phase III trial of Sun et al. [4] demonstrated that outcome achieved with TRT starting with the third cycle of chemotherapy is non-inferior to results when radiotherapy was administered from the first day of systemic treatment. Median survival, remission rates and estimated 5-year survival rates were equal in early and late arms and comparable with best historical results. Although total radiation dose was lower than actual standard, dose-delivery of chemotherapy and TRT was high. In the late TRT arm initially involved lymph nodes were considered in the target definition even a significant response occurred after the second chemotherapy cycle. How can we declare the results of this study? Most relevant finding of Sun et al. [4] is, probably, the fact that in both arms complete responders to CRT demonstrated significant better outcome compared to partial and non-responders. Complete response remains to be highly significant variable correlating with overall survival on the multivariate analysis. This strong correlation is very important and was not reported in the earlier randomized trials. Solely, study of Jeremic et al. [5] found higher complete remission rate in the early TRT arm accompanied with better long-term results, but remission grade of the tumor, itself, was not analysed as a prognostic factor. There is a growing body of evidence to keep response of the tumor in course of CRT under control. Small studies have already demonstrated that rapid achievement of complete remission in LS SCLC can be a significant prognostic factor.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».