Third Congress of the WUWHS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We have been invited by the Editors of the International Wound Journal to provide an editorial in preparation for Congress 2008. As the Chair and Co-Chairs of the congress we are delighted that the IWJ chose to add an additional copy of the journal in support of the many initiatives of the congress. We are also pleased that the cover of the Journal was changed to red, the conference colour, to recognize the importance of our Congress. Firstly let us provide a warm welcome to all readers who will shortly be in Toronto. And to all of you unable to attend – we will miss you! Much activity has taken place in the past 4 years and in particular the past few months to get prepared for the congress. To all involved we thank you and look forward to an exciting event, meeting old friends and a well deserved holiday post congress. The third meeting of the World Union of Wound Healing Societies is truly a partnership between the University of Toronto, Women’s College Hospital, wound care associations and wound care publishers. Industry has contributed significantly through unrestricted educational grants. As individuals, we all participate in the creation and dissemination of wound care knowledge. We all share the common problem of preventing and treating wounds. Collaboratively, we can provide a unified voice for the development of wound care as a clinical multi-professional specialty. That is ‘One Problem – One Voice’. Congress 2008 provides a forum for the dissemination of evidence informed practice on a global basis. Through the efforts of many of the participating organizations the World Union has initiated the collection, review and dissemination of the evidence base for wound care on an international basis. The primary goal of Congress 2008 and the World Union of Wound Healing Societies is to present the wound care evidence base, provide expert knowledge and transfer the knowledge, skills, and attitudes for improved patient outcomes. Included will be the alignment of evidence-based medicine to “Evidence Informed Transdisciplinary Practice” that fits the clinical needs of practitioners caring for persons with wounds. Treating acute and chronic wounds is an ongoing challenge for health care professionals in all parts of the world. Social, economic and technological differences, however, can create a vast divide in global approaches to wound care. Congress 2008 embraces the multicultural, multidisciplinary nature of its audience and provides an opportunity not only to network but also to work together for the benefit of all wound healers on a global basis. This will be accomplished through a preconference day, four plenary presentations, and 10 concurrent streams with 100 educational sessions, a summary of which is presented in this Congress edition. For the last three years, we have been working on a web-based initiative to link wound care evidence and expert knowledge. The website will be presented in a ‘just in time’ format for improved patient care. The evidence summaries created will also be presented to each delegate on Sunday in the form of a CD. They will also be freely accessible on the website (WoundPedia). This is not a one-time effort, but a continued collaboration of the World Union and our partners. Under the stewardship of Professor R. Gary Sibbald, during his tenure as President, the initiative will be a legacy of the WUWHS. This is not the end, merely the beginning! As a global community of wound care specialists, we need to share our insights, data, and awareness of common wound care concerns and solutions. When we do this, we can build new initiatives to advance wound care practices and to improve patient outcomes globally. Your experience matters, so we are counting on your active participation. Don’t be shy - we all have much to contribute. Your experience is our experience! It can make a difference in the lives of persons with wounds somewhere in the world.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».