Do the Gods Wear Capes? Spirituality, Fantasy and Superheroes (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Do the Gods Wear Capes? Spirituality, Fantasy and Superheroes Valentino L. Zullo Saunders, Ben . Do the Gods Wear Capes? Spirituality, Fantasy and Superheroes. New York: Continuum, 2011. 187 + xi pp. hbk $90.00 (USD); pbk $24.95 (USD). ISBN: 978-0826441980. Saunders's book enters an ongoing discussion on superheroes and their relationship to studies in classical mythology as well as theology. In the past decade, numerous critical monographs have been published, ranging from Christopher Knowles's Our Gods Wear Spandex: The Secret History of Comic Book Heroes, to Wendy Haslem's Super/Heroes From Hercules to Superman, amongst others, examining the intersection between the study of the American superhero and religion. Entering into this ongoing conversation, Saunders's book transitions away from the comparison of superheroes to mythologies and instead approaches the superhero as an embodiment of a modern version of the perennial wish of humans, which Saunders describes as "the wish that things were otherwise" (3). While exploring the relationship between theology and the American superhero, Saunders works to elevate the perception of the superhero: "I admire and value the work of philosophy to such a degree that I am actually trying to elevate the status of the superhero comic by association" (6). Saunders attempts to demonstrate that superheroes are not just "hyperbolic, violent fantasies," but rather they are "in the same conceptual territory as, say Also Sprach Zarathustra, the Baghavad Gita, and the tragedies of Shakespeare" (7). Saunders posits that the overall lesson in the superhero genre is not about violence but to "try love, period. This is not astrophysics, or brain surgery. It's not Kant or Hegel or Lacan or Derrida or Jean-Luc Marion. It's more difficult than all of them. Be kind, you say? What . . . all day? Be Kind all day?" (14). Saunders's book is divided into five parts; each part of the book is based on a different superhero, and the last section is focused on comic studies. In the first chapter, Saunders ultimately argues that Superman teaches his readers that virtue is more difficult than seeing through walls and outracing a speeding bullet. The second chapter explores early representations of Wonder Woman, which, according to Saunders's argument, can be viewed not just as fetishistic, but as demonstrating a submission to divinity. Saunders then aligns Spider-Man with the "Knight of Faith," a term which Kierkagaard uses only for Abraham. Saunders argues, "In Kierkegaard's terms, in fact, Spider-Man might even be the greatest superhero of all" (94). Finally, through Iron Man, Saunders makes an interesting case for the relationship between humanism and technology by pursing the analogous relationship between alcohol dependency and technology dependency, ultimately demonstrating that Tony Stark must "let go" and open up to love and friendship. The last chapter notes the lack of comic scholarship and calls for more academic discussion of the medium. Saunders's text, while producing an impressive study of the superhero, suffers in its analysis of Wonder Woman. Though the chapter is intended to liberate Wonder Woman, the only person freed in this chapter is Wonder Woman's original creator, William Moulton Marston. The chapter is intended to focus on deconstruction; however, Saunders reifies the hierarchical binary of male and female by focusing on Marston throughout the chapter instead of [End Page 473] discovering why "Wonder Woman gets no respect" (36). Saunders produces a reading where Wonder Woman is relegated to the background. In previous chapters, Saunders would use the character's creator as a way to historicize the character, but in this case the reader learns more about Marston than Wonder Woman. Instead of an analysis of Wonder Woman, then, Saunders produces what could be considered a biographical study or even a historiography of Marston through Wonder Woman. As a text dedicated to the exploration of the intersection between theology and superhero studies, this book demonstrates through high theory that this intersection is productive and thus explores modern theology as well as furthers the current study of the superhero. Saunders explains the theory in an excellent manner, allowing it to open up discussion without distancing those unaware of the theories he cites. The strength of Saunders's...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».