Jeu de masques : Les femmes et le travestissement textuel (1500-1940) (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Jeu de masques : Les femmes et le travestissement textuel (1500-1940) Melanie Hawthorne Beaulieu, Jean Philippe and Andrea Oberhuber, eds. Jeu de masques : Les femmes et le travestissement textuel (1500-1940). Saint-Etienne : Publications de l'Université de Saint-Etienne, 2011. PP 284. ISBN 978-2-86272-578-9. 27 € (Paper). This wide-ranging volume of essays stems from a conference held at the University of Montreal in 2009 on the theme of the myriad ways writers have "cross-dressed" textually, that is the ways women have assumed a male identity or position (and also, though less frequently, the ways men have presented themselves as women) in literary texts in French. The volume is the first work to be devoted entirely to this topic of authorial masking (as distinct from the theme of cross-dressing as a topic within literary texts themselves), as the editors remind us in their preface, and although this might sound like a very focused and specific field, the range of forms such textual travesty may take is truly daunting, as this volume testifies. To begin with, there is the vast chronological sweep encompassed here, from the Renaissance to the mid-twentieth century. The end point of this collection of essays is 1940, meaning that World War II, women's suffrage in France, the impact of Simone de Beauvoir's Second Sex, the second wave of the women's movement, écriture féminine, and so on all fall outside the scope of this book, but this nevertheless leaves several centuries to cover. And then there is the range of genres, comprising everything from gynecological tracts (invoked by Claude La Charité) and polemical writing (Renée Claude Breitenstein) to journalism (Joyce Carlton Johnston on Delphine [End Page 105] de Girardin). Since the book originated as a conference, most of the essays are somewhat short in length (twelve pages or so in print), but this means that many more voices can be included without making for an impossibly long volume. It also means that some authors are the subject of more than one essay: there are three on Rachilde alone (Marie-Gersande Raoult, Patrick Bergeron, and Marilou Denault), and two on the emerging figure of Claude Cahun (Charlotte Maria and joint authors Andrea Oberhuber and Nadine Schwakopf), though only one each on George Sand (Françoise Alexandre) and on Colette (Angelica Rieger). The reader will encounter some names that are expected (Mademoiselle de Montpensier, for example, treated here by Virginie Cassidy) along with some who are more off the beaten path but welcome additions nevertheless to the canon of women's writing (Madame Daudet [Virginie Pouzet-Duzer] and Valentine de Saint-Point [Paul-André Claudel]). And while the focus is on women who laid claim to textual masculinity, the stakes of putting on metaphorical skirts are not ignored, with an essay by David Martens on Prosper Mérimée's dressing himself up as Clara Gazul. These enticing topics make for quite a spread, hence they are organized chronologically into three sections. The first is Postures rhétoriques et discours auctoral, which, in addition to those already mentioned, contains essays on Jeanne Flore (Cathleen M. Bauschatz), Helisenne de Crenne (Dora E. Polachek), Mathurine (Jean-Philippe Beaulieu), and Suzanne de Nervèze (Sylvie Tremblay). The middle section, Effets de pseudonymie, contains aforementioned essays on Girardin, Sand, Daudet, and Mérimée along with Juliette Figuier (by Valérie Narayana), while the last section (Se masquer, se travestir, s'écrire) is devoted to the more modern authors Rachilde, Saint-Point, Colette, and Cahun. The editors do an admirable job of summarizing and highlighting all the essays in their introduction (they are able to do so more extensively than the limited space of a review such as this can allow), and for readers who want to get a sense of the many complex issues raised by literary cross-dressing, dipping into this preface is highly recommended. Some readers will want to go straight to the essays on one period or author, but they will find that browsing is rewarded. The volume has a useful bibliography and, thank goodness, an index, so that if the reader wants to know if...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».